Search results

Millwall were once top of the league in December and ended up getting relegated. Doesn't mean anything. Our situation will be different to everyone else and we couldn't be more different to Forest. They were given money to sign players. If anything we'll be seeing more leaving.

Erm...so what's the point of this thread then?

And the Tory party could become considerate and altruistic while Scarlett Johansson could declare her undying love for me. There's positivity and then there's delusional optimism.

Agree entirely. If the Hyam sale was for say £3m and meant that our expenses were covered and didn't have to sell anyone else, the I could at least understand the thinking, even if I do think it leaves us weak defensively and we'd need to make a signing anyway. If it doesn't do that, then what...

Yep. Investment is putting the money in and getting a return from improved performances brought about by that funding. Loans is getting a return regardless. Hence why they prefer it like that.

Not sure whether to swap Moore for Wilson. If he made another error having a larger home crowd on his back could be horrendous. I'd bring Hamer back in for Allen. Going by their results so far 0-0. Going by ours 3-2 either way. Though given how we usually play against them most probably to them.

But it's swings and roundabouts. If they take sell the player and the team performs poorly then the price people are willing to pay for the club goes down. It's a nonsensical thing to do.

That's a potential, problem in itself. Just a month ago we were thinking if we can consolidate or improve again this season, there will be a lot of squad turnover in the summer and we could look to build again, As things stand we look like we're going to regress and that will make replacing...

None of the money we get for Hyam will be being used to bring players in. If we're lucky he'll be allowed to use the wages on a loan, but don't count on it.

Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.

We might have had this sorted years and years ago if we hadn't had governments that prioritised the profits of oil and gas companies over environmental impact and energy independence.

Maybe. But it's a bit fucking rich coming from a guy that claimed taxpayers money to keep his fucking horses at his second home warm.

Well, until recently the solution was no game taking place. Very unprofessional stance. You don't just wing it hoping you can find a solution. You inform people that there is a likelihood they won't be getting what they paid for and offer complimentary tickets elsewhere. Yes, there may be some...

Thing is for her it doesn't matter if someone judges her on words or deeds - they'll both be an absolute horror show.

Could get at shit-ton of sponsorship if they just called themselves Saudi

Trouble is we've now got under a week bfore the end of the transfer window so if we sell Gyo in the next few days I think it's very unlikely we'll be getting a ready-made replacement in.

See Rishi's batting his eyelids at the mentalists again. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-62664537 Fact is most of the absolute shitshow was down to POLITICIANS ignoring experts, like Boris keeping everything open because he thought it was nothing and we'd get the economic boost. Other...

I'm not a fan of loans, but if you're bringing them in it it has to be with the expectation that they'll be capable of playing for the first team very quickly.

I guess it depends on it you take it from a 'better or worse' perspective. You *could* argue that these lads may have more talent and will end up having better careers, but that's not relevant to us. If they are they won't be playing for us then. So what matters is now. And if MR thought JCS...

They're all using the Trump playbook now. Ride roughshod over law and common decency then act the injured party when called out on it, claiming witchhunts and bias. For some reason there always seems to be enough people willing to lap it up.