Search results

OK, maybe misleading is a better word.

I put at the bottom that afterwards I realised you were putting your own price of £20 rather than the actual £24, so it would either be the same price at Cat C. As I said it's technically true but it's disingenuous. Yes, there is a saving of up to £10 per match. But that's only for 6 out of 23...

It's not exactly rocket science is it. Paint whatever you do in the best possible light even it's disingenuous. Rely on people not paying attention or being a bit stupid. You're on about marketing of ST and match packages as the price per game and the saving from it. When ST's are put on sale...

It's just fairer isn't it though. If a club takes loads of away fans they get nothing financially from that. It asks the question why go to away games when you're just giving money to your rivals? You can talk about the support they give but then why not practically give tickets away for home...

That could have a negative effect as fans would feel like the club are pulling a fast one given that only 6 of the 23 games would be a decent saving. There's 5 cat C which would be spending £4 extra. It'd be a PR nightmare as it comes across as disingenuous and treating the fans like idiots...

So they get better support at the game. Statistically you're still more likely to lose an away game and your fans will almost certainly be outnumbered (even though away fans tend to make more noise). If you think about it you take a huge following to away games you're effectively giving your...

I think that'd put people off having the jab.

Always felt the revenue from away sales should be split more evenly between the clubs. Seems like a lot of work for a club to help their fans go to away games for little benefit. What's the point of a club having a massive away following if they get very little from it financially?

But if the system does that where does the person sit? I thought the rules said each fan had to have an allocated seat (unless terraced which we aren't)? I'd assume you'd have to get the voucher swapped for an actual match ticket at some point, either at the ticket office or at the turnstile...

I think you've answered the question. He's in the cabinet BECAUSE he's a c***. It's a prerequisite. If you're not a knob you can't have the job.

One for the ladies. Help Out To Get Eat Out. Have the jab and you get tongued by the celebrity of your choice

If we got rid of those I'd want a more long term solution than Cranie. We're already having to have one eye on finding someone to replace Fadz over the next year or two. Don't really want to be having to look at replacing another at the same time.

Not exactly renowned for keeping with the times. They're probably keeping up with the current trends from the medieval period.

He must have been smoking some good shit when he gave that interview. Which is probably why he wanted to play for the Netherlands.

Let's invent a drinking game. If Bright plays everyone has to neck a pint. If we let Bright join in he'll be working his bollocks off to get on the pitch.

Maybe there is a slight thing about being proven right but i think it's more as compensation. Like when something happens that you predicted would happen even though you didn't want it to. You'd much rather it hadn't and been proved wrong but having the "told you so" moment slightly numbs the pain.

How does the current system work? Do you get 6 vouchers and just use them on the day or do you have to redeem them for an actual match ticket so you have a specified seat? If so do they just go through the cash turnstiles or visit the ticket office? I think the points system would be viable if...

I really want to see Ronaldo go to PSG just so we can say Messi and Ronaldo played in the same team like it was FM or FIFA. Plus seeing the two egos together would be...interesting