Search results

I wouldn't bother with any move, unless it's an unlikely move inwards.

The impression really ought to be moving day by day that they're not so much evil and conniving as incompetent and desperate.

Rashida Jones also has absolutely no financial backers, and I think her takeover is self-serving. You hear me Jones?

It seems a bit last chance saloon for them really.

On the off-chance, I think Eliza Dushku is incredibly corrupt and would definitely say it to her face.

And you're doing this to people who plan to. This is what I'm talking about.

I'm not ignoring anything, I'm pointing out that people committing the cardinal sin of being football fans wanting to watch their team are being slagged off, all the while as you complain that other fans who protested (a large number of whom would also continue to buy their season ticket next...

Ignoring the immense irony in that first line: You're complaining about people criticising your protests, and you're now doing the EXACT same for people who support a football team and want to go watch. Do you see? If people want to protest or stay away while they're in charge, good on them...

UNITY ONLY HAPPENS ON MY TERMS. Congratulations for proving my point, you thick hypocrite. You should form a picket line and scream 'scab' in the face of the JSBs.

If ridiculing fans is bad, you should probably then think twice about doing it to people who want to go watch their team play football.

He said, in the same thread he was slagging off people who want to continue going to watch their team.

This is pretty much how it comes across to me. 'Nothing left to lose, let's try this' kind of thing.

The idea that fans wanting to go watch the team are now the enemy is fucking retarded. This is the level we're at again is it?

Yer, that's the spirit!

It could be argued that what's best for the club would be to wear them down to an even better deal with all the matchday profits and so on. Obviously it's all a shady practice, but 'best interests' is too vague to be able to define easily without wily spin being able to be applied.

You'd be hard-pressed to legally define what's best for the club in a case like this, but if what SISU are doing is against the law in some way they can't last.

I think we're stretching the definition of 'good' a touch.

He's working for the owners who are still pretty much acting as they always have, as has he. It's not like he was ever trumpeted as a fans' own representative. If he's serving us shit, at least he's consistently doing so.

He's the manager of the football team, so he's concentrating on football stuff. If things out of his control prevent them from happening that's not really something he can influence, but he should be planning in the hope that all the shit is lifted.

If we stay put - mebbes aye. If we move (even if travel is covered as Cov Mad hinted at) - naw.