Search results

I agree but why shake on it then? Makes no sense

Why shake on it then? They obviously thought is was a good deal and fair else you obviously wouldn't shake on it. Your boss may not agree sure that's fine but no reason as to why not as your two directors think it is good. She made the decsion to be an arse as it had got personal and wasn't...

Yes I don't understand what you're getting at?

Just like I tried to tell Godiva but he seems to think sisu offered to pay the charities costs. It would of been ruled anyway.

Obviously TF and ML thought 400k was fair. They shook on it. What's your response to that? Food and beverage being the answer doesn't cut the mustard( excuse the pun) as TF and ML thought it was a good deal.

I couldn't agree more with hobo last sentence. There has to be an agreement between all for all to move forward else there is nothing other than disaster waiting. The offer to confirm was for 3 years after the the YB deal happened on jan 15th. TF and ML shook on a 3 year deal in the 19th jan...

Yes I'm referring to the offered agreed in January 2013 and shook on by TF and ML personally. It was 3 years at 400k a year then discuss a longer term strategy that depended on ccfc league and finance. It would have never gone back up to 1.3 p/a. JS then backed out of the deal that was shook...

Because it was 400k for 3 years and then could of actually come down not up. Well it was dependent on what league ccfc were in.

That's not completely correct grendel. Sorry about that.

You really are a WUM. Personally I love it. Carry on MR SISU

Sorry mate I appreciate the message in our fansite but at least you play in leeds at your home. That's all I have ever wanted. Don't care what division as such but care about playing in Coventry. So thanks but not appropriate here. Though I do understand your club is in a downward spiral and...

Classic Wum

Calm down stucov

Yes I know what you're getting at at that's fine. But surely it would of costs them less to settle out of court than in court? Right or wrong I wouldn't care I would want the option that cost less money? Also it's obvious sisu only counter claimed to get Higgs to go away but they didn't...

Good debate. NOT. Except the fact that the 590k was a condition of staying in the league and this was mentioned. I have asked the question now so wait for the response if I get one.

So says MR Otium

Yes I agree. What was the judge said " no appetite in neither side" basically both sides are to blame for the talks failing down. Yes I agree again but it would of cost sisu more than 29k to pay their 7 lawyers and that's what annoys me it's just clear bullying tactics and a horrible way to...

Again I can't see the emails and documents they gained showed nothing of importance and even when used in JR nothing exactly Jumped out. Sisu couldn't claim costs from the charity Higgs. You believe what ML said. What was it " it was very magnanimous of joy not to go claiming costs against a...

Yes that's exactly what I'm saying. Higgs never wanted to take sisu to court over just 29k it's not worth the legal fees which would be over 29k so really not worth it. All they wanted was a settlement on the 29k out of court done behind closed doors. Instead they are dragged through court...

Yes I agree with that but surely there is another way round just 29k. Higgs were just looking for a settlement on it not the full 29k. Instead there are countersued and taken to court and ended up costing much more than 29k. Charity again losses out.