Search results

(With respect) Does it matter?

It may very well have been someone else although I did say I didn't think we would sign anyone for a fee.

Never said that FYI.

Are you the same jack martin who said and started the thread that "sisu will win the JR"? Changed your tune yourself I would say. Not just Sandra

Just LMAO at this. Obviously its a joke and a good one at that. Well done. Why do people reply to this drivel?

That's nothing to be fair about is it. Look where the appeal got them and us fans? absolutely fregin nowhere so not really "fair to sisu" is it?

Perhaps. Sisu have indeed gone about it all legally and morally wrong though and that's where all the hate lies. The reason why some people won't go the Ricoh even if ccfc come back.

Yes I think anything to get the club home as it boosts the fans and obviously money will be a lot more than at sixfields that's for sure. CCFC/SISU need to be part or be ACL going forward and this should be taken over from the council and ccfc/sisu and lets higgs go off with their money and...

Yes but ACL wont dissolve that's the problem isn't it. Do you think we should be back before the season starts on a low rental short term agreement or any other suggestion?

Its about what is fair and what is legally right and that's the way it is. We all agree the rent was too high and revenues should go to ccfc. (never saying this again) What level of rent is fair to you then? How much?

I agree with some of that yes but 2 questions for you? 1. Surely a rent reduction of 90% outweighs rights of match day income which we know to be worth not as much even though you have the same problem? 2. Why did TF and ML shake on 400k in January 2013 if 150k wasn't good enough? The point...

Yes we all agree Ian including ACL. things were changing. rent was shook on at 400k remember by TF so he saw nothing wrong with that. Why did Sisu turn down 150k for 10 years last year then? Why did Sisu turn down 150k for 10 years last year then? a 90% reduction in rent. Wouldn't of needed...

They will finally understand one day. I live in hope. Its just basic business and figures that you don't have to be Peter Jones to understand.

The CVA was rejected for many reasons all stated a million times and if you actually believe if acl would have accepted the cva we would be at the ricoh "some time ago" you really are naïve or struggling to come to terms with the judges verdict. Sisu were intent on not paying the rent and...

Fact 1 - the rent deal was to go back for arguments sake to 1.3 but in principal it would be "market rate" well below 1.3m you should know. Fact 2 - Of course it had no revenues as it was a 90% reduction on the rent. Is that not moving an inch?

2 facts Grendel. Fact 1. the rent deal was 400k for 3 years and didn't return to 1.3m as you wrongly suggest. Fact 2. ACL offered an even better 150k 10 year rent deal on the eve of liquation. Believe it or not to keep Coventry City in Coventry

ACL have offered numerous rent reductions so how is that not moving an inch? The judge has proved your beloved sisu wrong not me.

Really? I don't know but I didn't think they wouldn't speak to each other. That's the only way to sort this mess out.

I don't understand, what are you talking about?

Couldn't agree more. He was a good player for us hence moving on to better things but he is clueless about this situation. Its not about growing up and maturity. Its about a greedy hedgefund trying to rip off a local council/company and I quote "distress acl and legally stop paying rent to claim...