Search results

I felt Simms had a lot to offer but we just weren't getting it out of him at the time. Now he has we're seeing the forward I thought was in there. Similarly Sakamoto needed us playing more to his strengths as a winger. But I was massively wrong about Wright. At the start he didn't just look...

Given how many games we've got coming up he'll play at part. Obviously I hope that will involve a few more goals too. Him and O'Hare only need one for double figures and we'd have 4 players on 10+ goals in a season, which would be phenomenal. Especially when Simms and Wright have a possibility...

Always the way. Birmingham assume what is good for them is good for the entire region. London assumes what is good for them is good for the entire country. I guess even Coventry thinks what is good for them is good for Warwickshire as a whole.

I imagine the intensity of the games is much higher than he's used to so it's hard for him at the moment to maintain the level from when he first joined. Clearly got technical ability, but probably needs a pre-season to adjust to the physical demands.

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA SETTEE!

OK, maybe keeping Wright on was the right thing to do. Huge sense of relief, but been far more nervy than it needed to be.

Wright travelled halfway across the world during the wekk, looks tired and stays on. Simms, on two goals and cuasing problems goes off. Similarly Sheaf on a yellow stays on instead of Eccles, though I can understand wanting to keep the midfield general on when we're looking nervy.

or maybe not...

Should be looking to give Wright and maybe Lati a rest and protect Sheaf and Kitching from another yellow

Simms only got 2 in the first half. Get him off!

Another first half hat trick on the way?

No. 12

I was expecting it to have Gyokeres on it.

Hope we can get some goals early on and allow those that have been on int. duty a bit to come off early. Going to be knackered with the fixture list coming up otherwise.

Sorry, can't let that go. It's just wrong on too many levels.

That was my first thought. And frankly why shouldn't govts be allowed to act like a business and do a hostile takeover? Aren't we always hearing how public bodies need to be more like private ones? Frankly if you've come begging to the public purse for money then they get to dictate the terms...

Anyone want to have a stab at altering the lyrics to it?

I wasn't clear. I overall agreed I'd play Bellingham more advanced with Rice and Mainoo deeper, leaving Maddison on the bench I also meant that if I were to pick maddison I'd drop Mainoo for him and have a middle three of Rice-Maddison-Bellingham