Search results

Our inability to control games against weaker sides, over reliance on individual brilliance in attacking areas and struggling to break down teams that sit in. Plus more than our fair share of bad luck and costly individual errors.

I just wouldn't attribute our poor results to lack of leadership

So brittle that they came back from 2-0 down away at the leaders on Saturday, did the same against Luton a few weeks ago too?

Bollocks One thing I 100% agree with Doug on is that we have the quality to be challenging the top 6. Maybe an addition or two needed in Jan but we have a lot of talent at our disposal.

I feel sad now

Haji Wright

Does anyone know if we can access a full version to listen again?

The greek bloke in charge of forest is an egomaniac but look at them!

he did? said averaging a point a game over the last 30 ish games isn't good enough

Doug does come off arrogant as fuck to be fair but I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing in his position

Can anyone share :ROFLMAO: Ad revenue must be through the roof

I suspect it's more than an "application" at this point. Waiting for the ink to dry probably.

https://www.skysports.com/football/video/12606/13252886/coventry-confirm-frank-lampard-is-managerial-candidate Honestly, I think it will be Lampard now.

https://www.skysports.com/football/video/12606/13252886/coventry-confirm-frank-lampard-is-managerial-candidate

I think you're one of the most level headed and reasonable on here, but you're barking up the wrong tree on this one I think. It's perfectly possible to fall out with someone on a personal level even if you've been very successful working together.

King didn't say that, he said they fell out and Robins didn't want to work with him?

so why bother posting the screenshot, means nothing if it's not actually from the source

What you're saying directly contradicts what King said. According to King, Robins drove the sacking of Adi and King was against it. You saying he's telling a complete lie?

I don't think it does, probably just meant there was some disagreement on the settlement of the contract?