Search results

Burge 2 - worst performance I’ve seen from a keeper ever. Indecisive, terrible distribution and that ball. Sterling 3 - looked like he didn’t want to be there tonight. Outfought by their winger time and time again. No commitment to get up the pitch for the most part. Willis 6 - thought he...

Madness.

I misunderstood your point it seems. They’d be looking at it from a return-on-investment basis if indeed they are still interested in the financial performance at all. For the outlay they make there’s nothing that they take back in, so ROI is non-existent on a short-term basis. That’s why you...

Potential to write down intangible assets but I haven’t looked at the accounts. Won’t make a difference to the P&L performance of the business on asset base alone, though the reduction in turnover from being expelled would impact hugely. On an asset basis the club is as good as worthless...

No

That’s absolutely despicable behaviour, not allowing the kids to make their own minds up. I like it. More of the same.

How did it happen when Rangers went tits up? Can’t even remember whether it was a comparable situation to be fair.

More a figure of speech than any kind of insinuation. FWIW I fully agree with your stance, and would consider myself part of said ‘team’.

That wouldn’t surprise me one jot. Tin foil hats at the ready, team (can’t believe there’s no tin foil hat emoji!)

At the time I thought there was a huge misunderstanding on the admin process. By SISU creating these shell companies who held an interest in Coventry City (was it SBS&L at the time?) they would be able to approach the administrator and offer a higher margin of the debt than others purely due to...

Where you seen that? If it’s on twitter can you link to the tweets as I don’t use it.

Bit random. Proper fuming we ain’t in there tho. SISU out.

Scenes again tonight. Very harsh handball given and Man Utd go through.

Right up there with the stupidest things I’ve ever read.

27% is the actual amount. Over a quarter of future earnings now spoken for. CVC seem to want to be getting a 20% annual ROI as well.

Just had a look to see what CVC bring to the table. It seems under their ownership F1 was being run into the ground until Liberty Media bought them out and turned it around. Probably not the type you’d want to have a stake in your league.

Which is fine if the council were a corporate body, but part of the argument is can a public body like the council carry such prejudices when dealing with public assets?

Surely when it comes to photos of ‘87 and Wembley and suchlike people on here have photos they’d be happy to share for the benefit of this? I don’t really take photos so I’m useless for it, but some must.

My question around the report that was put out was that it indicates the ground sale and lease extension were indeed one transaction. Had that not been argued long ago? Both were agreed in conjunction with each other, whilst the council have been adamant they were separate transactions. Was that...

Impractical given the time constraints, but really like the idea.