Search results

So Blaine Rowe, Harrison Nee and George Burroughs all involved. Does this mean it’s Cian Tyler that’s gone to a PL club?

The full AJ story was posted on the ‘Football & Other Sports’ board last week.

You’re right in that it isn’t just about passing, but we are a team that wants to play progressive football and build patterns of play. To do this you need to be competent on the ball, which Kelly isn’t. 28% long passing success is abysmal. I take your point on his other ‘intangible’ qualities...

Why is the standard response nowadays “do you think you know better than Robins”? I don’t think Kelly is up to Championship standard, and I don’t see the huge issue with this. I’ve done a quick stats comparison between him and Ryan Woods (random average Championship midfielder) and whilst his...

Bizarre rationale. In case you couldn’t tell, we’re on a pretty strict budget that hasn’t stretched to cover all of the areas MR has indicated he wants to improve - his words, not mine.

He’s just not.

Stop calling him Salter-Clarke. It’s not fucking difficult.

Let’s not kid ourselves, he’s not an excellent player at this level.

Can we just nuke Twitter instead? Regarding their goal, poor judgement from Hyam to drop deep and play their man onside, and he was a bit wider than you’d like when out of possession. All comes back to his lack of pace and therefore he doesn’t have the confidence to step up and play him off.

And one wasn’t enough.

Had enough of these foreign imports.

‘No questions asked’ is an insane policy when you’re talking about primary-aged children. Like shmmeee has touched on, kids of that age largely aren’t capable of rounded analysis so questions would need to be asked to get them thinking. I don’t think it’s an alien concept to have policy for...

You could also sing his name to Glad All Over.

May be that Hyam is more suited to the central role than Rose. That’s how I see it anyway.

Pardon?

Glad we got this done in the end, and think he’ll be great for us. Looks like the pic has caught him off guard a bit though!

Is that reason enough for it to happen?

Its clear he sees the problem, but from the outside looking in it seems that he hasn’t got the resources to do what he wants about that problem. Edit: and I think it’s worth adding in here that I’ve nothing against the signing of Waghorn per se, and I do agree that having 4 strikers vying for...

Yes, what is interesting is that we actually announced his signing on the day of his announced release. So maybe he was offered something but had turned it down?

I stand corrected. Was sure they’d offered him a deal.