Search results

Spilt a bottle of Hennessy on the server which is in Canary Wharf.

Never do that again.

Data taken from an app called FotMob and it doesn’t quite tally to 9.8 xG but still gives a decent reflection: Gyokeres - 3.09 (2) O’Hare - 1.24 McFadzean - 1.15 (1) Waghorn - 0.70 Godden - 0.43 (1) Maatsen - 0.43 Sheaf - 0.27 Hamer - 0.25 Allen - 0.21 (1) Hyam - 0.11 Dabo - 0.09 Clarke-Salter...

When I was last signing on (around 10 years ago) there was a requirement for you to apply for 3 jobs a week in order to qualify for JSA. Applied for 35 in my first week, got one of them, and the rest is history. Don’t know about more recent developments but it was a requirement to go down to...

I’ve got some terrible news for you….

You are correct, but the EFL were surveying on this very subject 3-4 months ago. If there’s no prospect of the 3pm blackout changing then it was a waste of research. I’m merely asking the question.

Appreciate it’s not in the club’s direct remit, but has there been any discussion with the EFL regarding streaming of games in the future? There was a lot of research seemingly commissioned last season and then everything has reverted to normal.

With the amount of natural disasters they have, it amazes me that they do very little (in comparison to what they could be doing) about climate change.

Their defensive options are an absolute shitshow. I get the signing of White, think he’s ok, but they need a leader in there. As much as he’s not the best defender, I’d have looked to bring Mings in. At least he’s vocal, which is something they’re sorely lacking.

We know what we are We know what we aaaaaare Superior supporters We know what we are

Thought you meant Bright was on holiday then!

I thought it was white and gold.

NEVER.

In fairness, given his clear knowledge on the subject, he probably knows exactly what the ‘proposed alternative’ is and can’t really speak about too much. That would be my guess.

David James once played up front. Wouldn’t be bringing him in as cover for my strikers.

In fairness(!) I wouldn’t really want someone - maybe sub keeper aside - who was happy to sit on the bench. But you can’t be having the attitude that has evidently shown.

You seem to be making a case firstly for scrapping, then for updating or evolving? I’m all on board for tweaking it to make it more effective so don’t think that I believe the current setup to be sufficient - it’s proven not to be. As it stands, clubs are free to spend within their own means...

Fair, I had filtered firstly for LWB and then for LB. Seems he’s also played LM 7 times. So out of his 215 pro games he’s covered in a similar position 8 times. Forgive me, still not sufficient cover in my book. As others have also said, he seems to have a level of entitlement to not be...

In what way does he provide cover at LWB? He’s played LB (so not even the position we need) once in over 200 pro games, and yet we think he’s some kind of utility man? Fact is, if we’re playing WBs then we need to make sure they can play there properly - they are key to our entire system.

Pete, forgive me, but you seem to be very blasé about these kind of things in the last few months, far more so than 12-18 months ago. I don’t think we have to take “these risks” (which I read as hiring a bellend and employing someone who doesn’t cover our positional requirements) to improve the...