Search results

You are quite possibly correct. However, if one or more of the investors is identified as having substantial personal wealth, does that not open up the possibility of a shift in negotiating position if the other side know that? Who knows, that may not be the case, but I can understand the...

Of course it's relevant, it's entirely relevant, but it does not preclude a (private) acceptance of an offer in principle and moving on to the next stage of negotiation when of course that information will need to be provided. SISU can dismiss offers as 'derisory' if they choose, but to bring...

He hasn't provided them yet. What he said (iirc) is that he has confirmed in writing that all will be provided before anything moves forward. That will all come out during the due diligence process anyway, not sure why should a big deal is being made about it at this stage.

I suspect you're right. They may have the funds to make a 'walkaway' offer to SISU, but that might leave them with nothing to fix the mess that's left behind. I guess their thinking is that what money they do have is invested in the club and they pay off SISU over time as revenues increase on...

These are perfectly legitimate questions, but surely the answers will not come (and cannot come) until SISU accept the bid. These investors would be foolish to show their full hand at this point. If they were to declare that after acquiring the club they would pump in £15 million, it opens the...

...and Hoffman stated on the radio that he has said repeatedly in letters to the club that proof of funds and investor identities would be revealed in due course. Given that the club are leaking this stuff left, right and centre, his/their caution is more than justified it seems.

Hard to say. He sounded a bit annoyed and had only just learned that the second offer had been rejected. Said he hadn't even had chance to speak to the other investors. Not dead, and it does appear that communication channels between him and JS are open at least.

Just listened to the interview and to be fair it was made clear a number of times by SL that Hoffman wasn't keen to go on and that he only agreed when news of the rejected bid was leaked to Les Reid. Sounded uncomfortable and extremely unhappy with what has go on in the last 24 hours. Thought...

Not really. Hoffman was appointed to the board in 2008, at almost the exact same time he took on a huge task at Northern Rock. The criticism that should be levelled at him is that he did not resign from the board immediately because he clearly had no time to dedicate to the football club and...

Actually there is a massive gulf between the attendances. What they are getting now is unprecedented for them. Their top 5 average attendances in their entire history have been in the last 5 seasons. Good luck to them though, they deserve some success. There was no 9K opening gate in the mid...

There is another city centre site that (with enough money) might be suitable. It runs from Upper Well Street to Bishop St. All the land is owned by Trinity Mirror, and most of the buildings are either vacant or derelict. TM do have planning mission for a development that would sweep it all...

I think they have decent support, but also have a big catchment area with little competition - their 'local' rivals are Crystal Palace (Crawley are historically a non-league side). The population of Sussex is 1.6 million - as opposed to 850K in Cov and Warwickshire. Historically we are much...

Hopefully a good turnout for this. I hear Charlton fans have made a real effort here, subsidising travel, producing placards on our behalf. We should make an effort to give them the same warm welcome they extended to us at their place.

What the fuck I have just read? I too was wavering, but having read through this I'm now convinced that I'll renew. People talk about the 'gravy train' and 'lining SISU's pockets'. It's facile nonsense. The true aim of a boycott is an attempt to cripple the club financially, make it as...

He's right about income streams of course, we are heavily reliant on ticketing revenues, this is no secret. The question though is that by freezing/raising prices, have they not alienated people and in doing so convinced a number of people not to buy, and thus reducing those revenues? A token...

You couldn't be more wrong. 2013/14 was the first time Bradford had a higher average than us in a given season since 1958, and it was only the second time since the war. We have a much higher average attendance than them historically - it isn't even close. Since 2013/14 they have pulled away...

I'll probably have a block to myself. 50/50 at the moment. If I don't the lad will be devastated though. Will make a last minute call.

You're comparing apples with oranges though. The point about away games is that people will pick and choose and make a judgement at the time as to whether they want to go- which might depend on where it is, the time of year, how well we are doing at the time, what sort of away day it is, how...

This. A blanket price freeze would be bad enough given the season we've just had, but the fact they have put prices up in certain blocks (and remember prices went up for those people last season as the season before there were no zones) is, quite frankly, staggering.

Not disputing much of this, and clearly he was massively distracted during his time as a director. Quite possibly he should have resigned earlier; but that doesn't negate the fact he probably didn't have direct input and influence over the day to day running of the business. Not saying he is...