Search results

Which is strange as you always say it is only about supporting SP and the boys. So why are you talking about stadiums? Also SP and the boys want a return to the Ricoh so if you really want to support them........

It won't be sooner if it is not at the Ricoh It will be later So you are contradicting yourself

Think the real worry will be how will the players cope in front of 20 k plus. Will they still do the business or crumble under the pressure, as has happened every previous time we have given the fans any sniff of success and the attendances shot up.

Exactly I wish they would just drop it.also it is another month not at the Ricoh so another aprox 200k income lost by SISU

This club has had too many managers something like 12 in 11 years. That needs to stop we need consistency After Mr Fisher said this in one season we had three permanent managers and two temporary managers in one season!!!!!

It is a strange move by SISU I note the judge said SISU will have to pay Councils costs again. The aim was to tie them up in knots through expensive litigation. I assume they have legal protection insurance. So it probably is costing them next to nothing?

Shame SISU won't drop it, as it is pointless and will cost them money. It is not going to even be a bargaining tool as CCC are not going to meet them until after it has been kicked out. They may as well drop it as a good will gesture setting a better tone for the talks

Coventry Bitter - very nice You may think it was a crazy idea However after the club just escaped relegation Then Westwood, gunnerson and King goes Juke our top scorer gets sold in the January whilst we were in the relegation spots. I take it on the back of this you expected us to survive...

He wanted him on loan in the championship and you see no correlation to the club then signing him just after AT was sacked. Come on Grendel you are not that daft.

The only criticism someone could throw is the increasing attendances. Making it not look as bad as it is. However I suspect if Torch had not gone maybe the voucher is somehow included in attendances explaining the discrepancy there always is?

Point 7

AT inherited a relegation battle team in the division above that released its three best players after he took over. Then he was given 3 league matches (all draws) Two of which were against what two out to be two of the best teams in the division. So effectively he had one poor 90 minutes...

and getting the ball rolling on signing DMC

You are probably the most glass half empty person on here. So if you are starting to believe, then I am in that camp Hopefully the attendances that should come with such success will make SISU think really seriously about a return

What. I have to say that cannot be true. Also in all fairness 1.5 million for a league one rising star right back is a reasonable price. Possibility would not criticise them if they accepted that one. As long as the 1.5 million was reinvested in CCFC.

I hope it isn't the same as every other time when we start to finally feel confident about our team.

Who first went after DMC despite his abysmal recent scoring record prior to signing for us?

How have Huddersfield done in their last 10 games? I assume they are pushing for promotion in the Championship. As they are a financially backed club and according to many Mark Robbins is a fantastic manager?

Ah a grown up conversation. :) Yes quite handy in a way, as it seems the impending JR collapse is actually drawing SISU out. The miscalculation about Sixfields. That and the CET trying to close the door on a Tit for Tat through them. May shuffle SISU down the channel towards a resolution.

Have a beer to cheer you up a little bit