Search results

  1. D

    Question for PWKH

    Why did SISU (sorry Otium) not put them on the spot? Ie say we would like a ten year rent deal at 150k a year. What do u think the reaction here would be to that one, If it was not accepted? Once requested do you think ACL would have still rejected the CVA? Do you think SISU would have carried...
  2. D

    Question for PWKH

    However the question I asked was did ML really want that deal? ACL offered it. Did ML want it? What do you think Stu?
  3. D

    Question for PWKH

    My not so carefully worded comment minutes ago, asked if ML heard this offer. Whatever hat he was wearing at the time. Can I ask what was stopping him asking for that deal in circumstances that suited him better? Ask for it in the Telegraph the next day, if he felt it was not genuinely on offer...
  4. D

    Question for PWKH

    So when PWKH told you the offer was made to ML. That ML said today I don't represent Otium. Do you not think it is reasonable that he may have made a mental note of the offer? Or do you believe in your heart of hearts that that is it. If it was not offered to ML when he was in any other...
  5. D

    Question for PWKH

    You don't have to. It's just sometimes people don't want to answer certain questions on here. That's their bag. You obviously didn't, so don't have a pop at someone else when they don't
  6. D

    Question for PWKH

    and possibly not yourself either....... Why was it you were banned from this forum in your past and what were your names back then? Please feel free not to answer, if of course that is not for the likes of you and just Linnell.
  7. D

    Was it or wasn't it?

    Oops didn't realise asking such questions was a crime. Well officer Torch from the Internet Forum Police 'S' Division. Grappa seemed happy to answer these particular questions. Unlike the ones about his previous names and why he was kicked off. He possibly didn't want to answer them which is...
  8. D

    All for one and one for all

    Oh so we have gone from the complicated two companies they knowingly bought ( rather than inherited) Up to about 5 created by them Back down to the original structure of 2 ( but instead two of the new ones created by them instead)
  9. D

    All for one and one for all

    Just wondering what it means for us? Thought with you starting a thread on it. It may have some significance. Which I hold my hands up I failed to see? Unless it is the significance for the shareholders?
  10. D

    All for one and one for all

    Sorry Torch, but is this significant?
Top