Search results

From what I understand they go on past written word of what King and his agent has said. I hope it doesn't come down to that and this is just tabloid mumbo jumbo.

I do have to say as well that a verbal agreement is legally binding, although harder to prove than a physical document, obviously! I think a lot of this talk is really just that, talk. It's just a bit too convenient that we hear nothing for ages and then as soon as he's reportedly verbally...

Sky are no better than the tabloids - the amount of "nothing" stories on SSN is ridiculous! But I'd rather not see this story anywhere.

I forgot to say that, although I wasn't one of those asking for more transparency and taking the ethic of what will be will be, I've also enjoyed reading what Brody has written and other snippets of news from the boardroom.

This has got way off point, my point was that football fans can't have it their own way all the time. Transparency of behind the scenes goings on was asked for - not by myself, not by you, but by a hell of a lot of others - and that has been shown by the new board. For a majority of Coventry...

That I can't disagree with!

A wider audience than 200 million people?! You probably mean a more concentrated audience yeah? Thing is, it's not just Coventry he tweets about.

I quoted you because your message said the club shouldn't have said about verbal agreement. They can't win. And then you quote me and talk about dumb Coventry fans. Articulate your sentences better and you might get more valid replies for your self-alleged superiority over these "dumb" Coventry...

Look at what I said. Did I say I asked for every piece of news behind the scenes. No, I didn't. What I said was the fans have asked for it. The board have listened. Now some fans don't like what they're hearing in the media and they change the rules. So before going off on one at fans like...

Unconcerned?! How about have no money and can't do anything about it so what's the point in stressing about it. Unless you have a few million quid you'd like to pump in what do you think "concern" is going to achieve?!

Hah, no worries!

Fans ask for more communication and then twist things so they can moan. Brody said King had "verbally agreed", nothing about actually signing. He's trying to add transparency to behind the scenes goings on as has been asked. No wonder most boards keep their fans in the dark, it's just not worth...

Yeah, The Mirror has said that but there's still nothing concrete there.

Why? The fans have asked to be kept up to date with everything. When they communicated that Thorn had verbally agreed a contract nobody batted an eyelid. You can't go round asking for one thing and because you don't like what you hear start changing the rules. It just doesn't work like that.

It's more conjecture, there's no quotes or anything concrete. They're even speculating on who blues are geting rid - surprisingly those are the players EVERYONE has mentioned rumoured to be moving from them! The Mirror have just pulled this story from stuff said on the net.

They've come out and said it's been agreed again, I really don't see what else they can do. Fans are getting frustrated because of other fans, nothing to do with the club not communicating.

How? Because of some chinese whispers that have started?! Look above at the "don't get taken in" comment, we must all learn to just chill out on these rumours.

I wish people would stop saying "send him a contract to sign on holiday"! Let him have his 2 weeks relaxing and don't hassle him. If someone kept hassling me to sign a contract while I'm trying to relax and get away from home I'd tell them to do one.

Blues have less money than us, kind of like the new Pompey.

I was actually just thinking that. The "vote" today is ridiculous!