Search results

Grendel after your meeting with ML you said he was a man of his word and there would be a public open to all fans forum. Do you know when he intends to do this? Please no snide remarks about private forums. It is a genuine question?

Ok no worries I thought it happened Monday And I think I first found out about in Thursday. For future reference I would be the first calling someone a dickhead if they had a go at you for telling us about what ML said in a meeting with him. So if it happens again please start a thread and...

I think on this particular one you maybe off the mark a bit.

I don't think anything I have asked would cause someone to fear posting a thread about a meeting with ML. My issue has been why not discuss it. I have no issue with anyone attending a meeting. I think the questions are more why wait three - four days. Were the meetings not on Monday did this not...

I would hardly call people on here asking how are these meeting with ML happening really 'giving it loads' However as oppose to answering that simple question and saying things like do you want a meeting or not keyboard warrior and why don't you start a thread asking how these meetings are...

Grendel you are barking up the wrong tree on this one and it is a little embarrassing. I have no fear of having a pleasant meeting with ML on a hotel sofa whilst drinking. Discussing CCFC sounds very pleasant. It is unlikely he going give me a Glaswegian kiss whilst shouting 'you've had this...

No happy to do it in a proper forum in front of large group like I did before. Speaking on a microphone, did you do that? In all honesty if there was an open thing on here in the first place saying there are a few places who would like to go. I would have registered an interest. Or...

I get the impression it may have been replaced by the discrete little gatherings with people in pocket groups. Where he possibly hoped these people would then send out his message. The fact it took four days before it began to even trickle out on here suggests to me that didn't work out as...

The application of remedies once a Judicial review has been won are governed by the discretion of the judge ..... The discretionary nature means that even if a court finds a public body has acted wrongly, it does not have to grant any remedy. Examples of where discretion will be exercised...

I enjoyed the concerts there. It's nice to have that in Cov

However stars alone should never be viewed without the context of the situation

No news from the SCG then? Are the SBT still allowed to represent its thousands of members in a fans forum. Or do they have to toe the chairmans party line?

The not giving of a remedy does

Ex-councillor Brian Patton to stand v Ann Lucas on Get Cov Back to the Ricoh ... If you are going to organise a protest why don't you organise it outside the courtroom when the JR is on. The councillors you want to impact on will be present. As will SISU. As will ACL. As will the press. Then...

I think it was set up by the sky blues trust

I am currently catching up with this thread and it is seriously weird. Any news from the SCG?

Need to be back the Ricoh for that to happen. So over to you Joy

Support the opposition then

If they find SISU were also responsible for their actions the judge can choose not to even reverse the decision by the council it can still stand. It is in the judges discretion not to apply any remedy if he feels SISU's behaviour was at all unreasonable

You are right it has gone off track It seems it is possible that if a person or company win a JR. If their behaviour leading to the unfair decision taken by the public body was deemed unreasonable, then the judge can use his discretion not to apply any remedy in regards to the original action...