Search results

And forwards.

Neither. It was a smorgasbord.

That sounds more like constipation.

Does seem at bit odd but they did alright with Chaplin off us. I expect Tavares, Nee and Bapaga were ahead of him, but they don't have the similar physique. We had a lad called Rus on trial last year who scored a few in academy games. Wonder if he might be joining as U23?

Thank God you told me! Gives me the rest of the day to rearrange my outfit.

Saw more people score too.

merde du chien

What a day of football that was!

Au revoir

Cos footballs decided defending is no longer necessary if you have some technical ability.

Or just whack it in an account with even average interest and by 2987 you'll win regardless.

Was U23 last season too. Last season under 18's were Fallows (now released) and Bell

He's decided to turn it on. Far too often he can't be arsed and swans around acting the BertieBigBollocks (esp at man U). Celebration said it all about him.

Seems a bit odd given he's been here two years and only given a chance due to injury. He did alright when he came in but don't see what they see in a keeper his age. Looked a bit ropey at times and hardly instilled confidence. Also don't see why we'd bring in two new if he's here and they rate him.

Cian Tyler

But that's the stupidity of making an 'irreversible' comment. It's never the case, and certainly not in a situation like this, so why even make it other than for a soundbite to get the people that want restrictions lifted regardless (many of whom seem to have the ear of the Tory power base) onside.

Good to know he's going to look at the data and make a decision based on it :rolleyes:. Still, we all know what this means. CON+10

I wouldn't say we've got a much better team, but I think i'd rather have ours than theirs. Attacking wise I think player for player we're better. I'd rathr have Kane, Foden, Grealish and Sterling over Werner, Havertz, Gnabry and Sane Defensively both have deficiences. Their defence is getting...

It could potentially be a security risk if it were hacked, but at the same time using government arguments on things like CCTV in public places it provides security and peace of mind, reducing incidents as people are wary of being watched. Have to admit when I first saw the footage it came...

Fair point. But it still seems that when such behaviour is reported the problem the party see isn't the behaviour but the fact people found out about it. The wrong-doer often gets left off or given a slap on the wrist to appease the public, the person who exposed the wrong-doing gets hammered.