Search results

Very strange indeed. Even if we stayed up, what business in their right mind would think of increasing prices after the season we've had? Oh yeah...

The sentiment's right but hadn't Deegan and Platt gone off?

Yeah, I was sick and tired oof going over the same thing. I'd said my piece, you said your piece, you said it again. It wasn't defensive, it was exasperation, there's a difference.

No. Are you trying to infer you know what I'm like again? Your questions are the same questions. It was nothing more than going in circles. You may like discussion and questions, as do I, but try and keep it fresh. Don't just argue my point with what was essentially just saying the opposite -...

I honestly think you just like confrontation. My replies may come across as heated but they're not, it's just a way of writing. It's not as if I'm sat at my computer getting red-faced and pulling my hair out over some keyboard warrior!

No I didn't. You were going through exactly the same things I'd just been talking about, like if you said it all one more time I'd be like "oh, well if you put it like that". Don't come on here and pretend you know what I'm like with comments such as "worked himself up". My response was done...

Right, this is the "textbook reaction" because you think I think I'm wrong? Actually, it's because I can't be bothered to argue anymore with someone who the initial comment was not aimed at anyway but was so narcissistic enough to join in and dismiss my realistic comment as wrong (what a...

Christ. Do you know what, whatever. I'm sick and tired of having to argue stupid things like this about what I (that's MEEEE, not you) find realistic, what I don't like stuffed down my throat as beig realistic and most of all, arguing with people who like to argue just for the sake of it and...

So that's the same as 100% conversion rate?

You're taking form over the whole season whereas our form, at home, has picked up considerably in the last 7-8 games and that HAS given us a chance of staying up. Surely one persons perception of being realistic can be different to anothers, in which case I'd stand by my statement above...

I'm confused as to how predicting the future is now regarded as being a realist? We have as much chance of staying up as going down - that's being a realist.

Oh right, you're taking the piss. Get it. Original.

Clues in the "set Deegs on him"

Well, probably shouldn't reply something that isn't constructive and is actually what some people want to talk about.

Small glimmer of hope for what, staying up or beating Palace?

That's what a shock result is though, surely? Or am I completely missing the point here? My definition of a shock in this instance would be something tht's very unlikely to happen that does happen. Or is that wrong?

Yes, but by implying that other teams are capable of getting shock results then so should we be, as any result away from home would be a shock. Like I said, I'm not expecting it but it could happen. I don't think there's any need for loads of posts on how we lost again away - we know we can't...

You said in another post in your predictions you put in a shock result. Those were your own words. So, we could get a shock result. Stranger things have happened. Although in my predictions I had us picking up 1 more point away from home.

Right, I know people can look through sky blue tinted glasses sometimes but I think for some it works the opposite way too! Not saying we might not end up on 41 points, what I think won't happen though is that Donny pick up 19 more points, Forest and Bristol City both 21 points and Pompey with a...

I didn't, no. In fact, I think I had us only getting 1 more point away from home, so anything more than that this season is a bonus in my opinion.