Search results

That's my point I am gobsmaked that it was such a high attendance at that point with the tripe that has been served up and suffered by the long standing fans. Attendances in the whole have risen since those days. Put a successful team on the pitch (albeit league one) at the Ricoh and you will...

Are you talking about the 2005 season that my point refers to?

Out of those three I would prefer tounami.

It was fry-CCFC

Who was the chap when the strikers thread went off tangent. I said can we get back to speculating it was more fun. Someone said the next signing was to be Diagouraga. Good info it seems.

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/football-news/coventry-city-made-wait-over-7406560

In the entertainers seasons we averaged around 21k. That was the last time as a fan I remember Coventry giving me a team to get excited about. 1998-99. That was in the much smaller Highfield Road. Think 17-18k would have been our smallest crowd that season. Attendances as a whole have risen...

It's not going to be that same deal if we return though. The rent itself will be a quarter. I can't see if Coventry were back at the Ricoh playing attractive football in the top six. There would easily be 20k plus fans there in my opinion.

Surely it has to be someone who was captain for more than that. Otherwise they would just say ex Coventry player. Who are all our captains for the last 7 years?

Where did the CET get that bit from. It's not exactly the sort of thing you just randomly make up?

Is that 50% of the home matches in that 2005 season. I didn't realise it was that many. Just shows the potential that is there with CCFC. What a shame fans have suffered so much. Lets hope someone gets up back to the Ricoh with what this season could potentially be a decent first 11. Just a...

That's how it has been reported so far unless you know any different?

I think the general gist is ACL received £300k for costs of the football club reneging on their legal obligations. This should have been more but they accepted a deal. Separate to that SISU are to pay ACL 590K for not paying the rent they were legally obliged to. ML has apparently been...

He is saying the 'reported' 300k for costs paid by the guarantors plus the 590k for unpaid rent agreed by the FL and SISU 'reported' by CET and ML Equals 890k

................

The loss if earnings bit will be in the contract signed by the guarantors.

Completely agree The phone has to picked up and rang first for that to happen

Money from the guarantors is understood to cover ACL’s ‘loss of earnings’ rather than the agreement for unpaid rent insisted on by the Football League

From what you said about barriers Anne has said the door is open for talks (no barrier) Michael with due respect is not ACL (no barrier) ACL has said any deal has to involve paying debts first, or I would guess they have to be part of the negotiation. This was the case on the Higgs...