Search results

Why? This is working. When we try and defend leads it always goes horribly wrong as we give them the momentum by letting them attack.

FUCKIN HELL!!!

:love:

Probably about as strong a team as we can put out. Why put two keepers on the bench though? We've got loads of outfield U23's to give a spot to. Mind you, not like we'll use them anyway...

Has the poor love got a tiny bit of criticism and can't hack it. You're a politician - it comes with the territory. Especially if you want a prominent position and then have your own family not live by the spirit of the laws you create. Imagine if a loophole was found that allowed employees to...

235 yards off the tee.

No, but I think Dele took her up the Ndlovu aisle.

More horseshit there than at today's Grand National. It was almost a case of 'how many times can we mention the word Nazi. If it were a drinking game, everyone who decided to play would be dead. Also amazing the lack of irony in them talking about banning anything that doesn't agree with their...

Stalin has had a bit of a image renaissance in Russia in recent years. Unsurprisingly while Putin has been in power. It's not an accident.

I know MR has asked to look into why we're getting these injuries, but I'd suggest an obvious place to start is the small squad and the amount of minutes the main players are being forced to play. While the first can pretty much be laid squarely at the door of the owners, the second is largely...

Maybe. But you were disputing the claim that you didn't fawn over him, creating responses that were a bit overly critical. I've just shown you have claimed he's been playing well when the reality didn't match that.

So you could offset that unfairness monetarily with travelling time considered work time (up to say 2-3 hours so people aren't deliberately having jobs with long commutes) and travelling expenses paid and/or a premium for not being able to WFH.

Because you've got it the wrong way round. They get so rich because they're so greedy to start with. Inherited wealth, more just the fact they're brought up to believe they have to have it because the lower orders can't be trusted with money.

Not for the greater good. For his own benefit, his own ego, his own sense of self-importance and his own sense of superiority because of his wealth and upbringing. Maybe in his own head he think that equates to the greater good because he's had that priviliged brainwashing course tht seems to...

Induction for new MP's should be 3-4 months in social housing with only basic UC to pay for their bills.

When people quote increased productivity at the office it's obvious they think the lower orders are workshy slackers who need to be nagged to get anything done, or because they or their mates have big money in commercial property.

Bet if the law was changed that you had to pay people's travel costs to and from home as well as the time spent travelling they'd all suddenly find working from home actually was a great idea and it was ridiculous nobody had done it before. Agree entirely about the background noise. I really...

Also if productivity is increasing while people are at home without needing to be managed that much, it kind of makes their own job a bit redundant, and they don't want that.

To be fair you've been quick to claim he's been amazing. Got this on your spreadsheet? https://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/huddersfield-away.138883/page-4#post-2429925 Saying O'Hare looked on it when he'd had about two touches.

No, but the Downing St parties were. So if legality is the benchmark you're setting people's actions by I guess you want to say bye-bye to quite a few Tories...