Search results

If it's a short term deal similar to what has gone before, I can't see why it's taking so long There must be more to it.

No but we need more than Kelly

Apart from GK my priority would be midfielders who can move the ball from defence to the strikers without losing it or giving it away. I know that's what mids are supposed to do.............

I did wonder yesterday whether a combination of Oggy's and Burge's wages would be enough for Stockdale, although there are other GKs

I have mixed feelings. The first football advice I was given, 60 years ago, was " never pass across your own penalty area" but that was village football, not professional. My concern is that we seem very laboured in changing from defence to attack. A lot of good forward runs are missed. I think...

More sensibly we could put him on the bench and bring him on as a sub at 88 mins

I would like to see a big crowd on Sunday for several reasons, but I'm not convinced that those who are not close to the club are that well informed about league positions

It's got to be Stockdale as he's the only goalkeeper we've ever heard of

As I understood it CVC are not sponsors they are shareholders so will presumably take a share of the income distribution

You may or may not be right but all that you ask would be very difficult to agree in the timescale needed to satisfy every interested party. I hope and presume that a one-year deal is just to secure next season and that the parties will continue to negotiate long term. Both sides might not even...

Unfortunately you can't compare CCFC with Bradford. If Bradford increase attendance they sell more F&B CCFC get very little benefit from increased ticket sales especially if that is a result of lower prices

Well she's now seen more home games this season than about 20,000 who went to Wembley

If it is her I think it's a good sign that she's here.

We're all in denial about them...................................

Totally agree. What else do people expect. Whatever your opinion of SISU, they need to decide a policy before they make a statement, and as we have seen from previous events, SISU do not declare their hand until the last minute

Isn't part of that debt unrelated to the cost of acquisition. management or value of the stadium, but a loan to pay of Wasp's debt to their owner? In other words, Wasps have loaded a cost onto the stadium that is not inherent in it's value. So why should another party help to pay off that...

Only one

Fisher is a director of companies owned by SISU but he is not a director of SISU, Anyway, directorships do not necessarily mean power because we all know that in matters of this magnitude and significance, decisions are taken by Joy Sepalla. I'm not at all surprised by the silence as I presume...

Have I missed something, Has this come from CCFC or is it speculation?

But if Wasps acted in good faith and paid what was asked and agreed, it is solely the council's problem. Mind you, if there was a stitch up between Wasps and the council................