Search results

The pre-match diet of rum ham can't be doing them much good

The main pick would be Grendel free roaming in midfield. If it's like here his opposition will just spend the entire time following him around and trying to jump on him, leaving the rest of the team the freedom to score as many goals as they want.

There's every chance he'll end up moving here if he meets a couple of guys who are up to no good and start making trouble in his neighborhood.

Definitely coming back to check the reactions, people who genuinely leave just stop posting.

I was going to guess Jordan Turnbull

You can't blame anyone for staying away, considering we're coming up to nearly a decade of answers to the question 'why?' Conversely, if we started actually succeeding under the same owners it'd be tough to blame them if they were coaxed back.

That'd be a hell of a big sign

Certainly not with the current owners. They could turn a corner, get us promoted and hand out free maltesers at the turnstiles but they'll still be the fuckers that nearly killed it for me.

Live - your reactions to the JR relevations

Based on what people who knew them would tell me, I was convinced that by 2000 we'd have a hot-shot strikeforce of him and Chukki Eribenne.

This is an odd response to not knowing fixtures of a team you don't follow

Unless they were saying he'll never be good or strong enough, criticising him for playing poorly in a game isn't retrospectively proven wrong now.

Thomas Rawls picked a hell of a time to get healthy.

Amateur footage can be a huge help in identifying criminals or piecing together am incident, I don't think it's always morbid voyeurism although I'm sure that is part of it for some people too.

Hard to argue with that.

If people thought it was just a knockabout bit of fun that's fine, but I feel it undermined the gravitas that using Jimmy Hill's name can allow the group. I disagree that being talked about can only be positive.

The idea and the execution.

Some thought the invasion affected the game, and the witch thing was at best juvenile and embarrassing. That's the difference I see, whereas I can't remember too much opposition to the sit-in, the petition, the marches or anything like that. Apathy maybe, but that's impossible to avoid...

Not sure where you're reading that from my post, but no. I'm saying a badly thought out idea like calling the owner a witch isn't necessarily a success because people are talking about it if what they're saying is negative. The sit-in idea is a great one, a pasted witch hat not so much. It's...

If it completely puts someone off them then it really didn't work. Knowing who they are isn't the battle they're waging.