Search results

Well at least lots of people have become experts in football ownership. Before the last lot ruined the club and brought SISU in, nobody knew or cared about ownership as long as they backed the manager

I always thought that Fisher might have a financial interest in the club or SISU. No evidence, just a hunch

It's a commercial initiative so the club can charge more for names on shirts

You've been around long enough to know that the Ownership is not interested in the team as such, only the financial performance.

To be honest I'd forgotten that Godden was still here

Exactly. If Allen had started instead of Kelly I believe we would have won. I know the defence was culpable but a stronger midfield would not have surrendered so much ball to Wrexham

There were nine other player plus subs, who lost to a non- league side but you're not picking them outbfo comment

Well we didn't cope today.

If you put good crosses into a defence that can't defend crosses eventually you will score. Ok, the second was a fluke but if you don't try you don't score. Their conversion rate was better than ours.

I was hopeful for Tavares but wasn't impressed today. There was one incident when a ball was played from defence ( can't remember who) and Tavares turned his back on it as he thought it was going straight to the defender The ball went over the defenders head into space but Tavares was walking...

I agree that we should win but there have always been cup upsets. It's not a case of "our eleven players are better than your eleven players" It's a question also of team dynamics and motivation and, of course, your best team is not necessarily your best eleven players.

Strangely I read that as shitshavers

Two teams have conceded less goals than us All but five teams have scored more goals than us That should inform our priority

I'm sure if we got Man City at home in the next round there would be no problem selling the tickets that you guys wouldn't want

Which puts the club in a weak position when negotiating with Frasers

All except 4500 of them

I like that the ref seemed to take players to one side and explain his decision; at least that's what I assumed he was doing

I think the point is that Swansea made substitutions / shape changes which meant that they dominated the midfield. It changed the game and it was obvious that our lead was looking fragile. Robins was very slow to respond. I thought that bringing on Kelley was rational, although too little and...

.....or perhaps Seppala doesn't want to deal with Ashley

We can all speculate with no basis in fact or knowledge. How about Doug King being an intermediary because Ashley doesn't want to deal directly with Seppala?