Search results

Then I'm confused because I thought you meant because we don't know much about haskel there is a very real possibility he would be as bad as sisu, where as my point and my analogy was meant to show that while we don't know much about haskel and while it is possible he would be as bad it's...

We have the same amount of evidence that Haskell will be better owner than SISU as we have for knowing a random baby sitter is a better option for leaving your little girls with than Ian Huntley.

I wouldn't be going to watch team 1 play but I would be following their progress, team 2 it would depend on alot of things, while I see alot of scenarios though I don't think this is one that could happen. If Sisu stay and we arn't at the ricoh I'm probably not going to be seeing us play again...

Paranoia would be thinking SISU weren't really trying to negotiate with ACL and instead were trying to send them bust, oh wait that was true. Paranoia would be thinking Tim Fisher wasn't being honest when he said we were debt free, oh wait that was true. Paranoia would be believing SISU arn't...

I don't think the vast majority of people mean it literally though, a few might care about the post code but not many, if a new stadium was a similar distance or even a little further from the city centre than the ricoh very few people would have an issue even if it technically wasn't coventry...

Both you and grendel have said you won't go if they make you move seats so perhaps you shouldn't throw stones in your glass house. But otherwise I agree with you the postcode is irrelevent (other than for planning permission etc) the stadium needs to be close enough for quick access from as much...

no football team (well England of course) Probably get back into going to the Blaze.

But again I'm not saying the club can afford it, there is no deal the club can afford, fisher said he was able to agree a deal with acl if it meant the club wasn't losing money, if acl let them play there for free they would still be losing money, so there is no deal the club could agree, but...

I already answered it, if the club can't afford that deal then the club can't afford to move out either, the losses of being away for 3 years are massively greater than the losses of paying 400k for the 3 years while you rebuild. Not to mention when you do build a new stadium its extreamly...

Again negotiations were off because negotiations were done, that was there final offer and it was an incredibly reasonable one, that doesn't mean the club had no alternative but to move, the club that the option to take the deal that was only 33% of what they had been paying. It boggles my mind...

yes there should be no ifs, a simple question, not are you willing to accept 400k, the question should be are you will to accept in full the deal that acl offered as their final offer? any if's pretty much mean there answer is no, in which case it's them in the wrong and not acl. if the club...

Its by far the worst website I visit, Adverts dominate the majority of the screen, there are video adverts, pop up adverts, banners, audio adverts, when they produce their own videos the sound quality and picture quality is worse than kids manage on youtube, often significantly worse. There is...

The deal was already done, no more negotiation was necessary, it was acls final offer and it was a bloody good one, by saying we want to renegotiate its clear they still weren't happy with that deal and since acl won't go lower sisu say acl wont negotiate, but they already had, a massive amount...

it does not suggest they were willing to compromise, it suggests they still wern't happy with a lowering of the rent to 1/3rd a deal they agreed and still wanted it to be reduced further. But honestly it's stupid we are having to speculate it seems a very simple question to ask and the...

the negotiation was done, even if one party was only doing it to distress the other, a final offer was put out and agreed, so holdings do have a choice they could meet that offer, we have no reason to belive that it's no longer availible do we? Since administration hasn't gone the way acl wanted...

20 mill for a stadium way to small for us if we have any ambition left at all, so its going to be pretty expensive too.

deja vu, except with significantly less chance of actually getting our targets this time.

edit - sorry this post was meant for another thread, not sure how I managed that.

I'm sure sisu would happily leave for 30m but the club isn't worth anything like that, sisus outlays are completely irrelevant to the value of the football club. Thats more than SISU paid for the club when it was a championship club, with somewhere to play, with a team and other assets like...

Yes I do mean ACL in that statement, I also said your point about the spin was fair, I wasn't particually disagreeing with you. However while I agree with you that this statement is spin, the fact is spin isn't all created equal and I see very little issue with this peice of spin and do not...