Search results

It's not Betjemann. This is

Well they can, and pretty much do. It's no like they were selling it at that price for the good of the consumer. They were selling it at next to no margin because they could absorb it with the intention of driving independents out of business, thus reducing choice and allowing them price...

Bell, Stretton.

Only nanny gets to feed him. From the breast, obviously.

Well at least they're willing to be openly xenophobic.

But we're not just in need of a suit or sweatpants - we need underwear, shirts and shoes as well. It's all very well buying the fancy suit then realising your feet are bleeding because you can't afford any shoes,

But the amounts that they are rumoured to be owed also included interest on the money they loaned, so they could still have made more money than they actually put in. Plus they were charging management fees or some such, so were getting money there as well.

I said if the boxes sell it was a good idea. I didn't think they would as the price was too high and it appears that has been the case. If you mean selling at a price and then bringing the price down if any don't sell could be problematic. Sure, those that were willing to pay at the higher rate...

I was just pointing out that if King doesn't rate Boddy but Boddy told him what he was going to do would fail, it actually makes Boddy look like the one who knows what he's talking about. But because we live in a capitalist society King has the control and so even though he was the one who...

But DK could work on the knowledge that he would get £17m from Lisbon min. and so could bring in some of our targets based on that valuation by bridging the funding. Most fees aren't payable in full up front anyway. Then when we get the first payment for Vik when that goes through he takes his...

Be amazed we were spending more than £4m on a replacement, and no way is Simms worth £7m. If it was around £3m with add-ons and a sell-on clause I think it was just about ok. Any more is silly money. We need a few strikers so the money we have to reinvest needs to be able to bring in at least...

I prefer this idea to just giving the club the money. It is, after all, supposed to be a safety net due to the vast gulf in EFL and PL income and therefore wages. But at the same time it could still give them an unfair advantage as the relegated teams could decide to keep their star players as...

Typical CCFC. Get their ducks in a row then miss out on their targets anyway.

Bizarrely if Boddy/Scope etc were telling him they wouldn't sell at that price and he ignored them it makes them seem the more competent. Doesn't do much for Doug's standing within the club if he is micromanaging and not listening to people then having to do what they said in the first place...

Don't know when they'll be released but I've heard prices will be steep.

Maybe our infrastructure isn't ready, but that infrastructure takes a lot of money to put in place. Money we don't have, so that infrastructure almost certainly still won't be in place this year, next year or in five years. But do you what gives you loads of money to pay for that...

Given the shitstorm the rumours have caused I think it should be. Those who know. NO!