Search results

Could you not ask your mate to pay for you ;)

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but it that were to happen what happens instead? You've essentially only got three other 'mainstream' parties left and I don't think any of them would be great. LD's would be very similar to what we've seen before. Reform would be much worse than either...

He's a development player that will probably benefit from a loan out for at least part of next season. I wouldn't mind seeing him get time off the bench as part of a front two and with us playing two 8's and Grimes coming in.

But what is the use of chucking everyone immediately on the scrapheap? There has to be a chance to redeem themselves while at the same time them being taught about the severity of what they've done. If they're caught with a knife then they should get a second chance, so a hefty suspended...

I think if he achieves a PPG that would have been sufficient for play-offs over a whole season then he's had a good season.

It's a fair assumption for him to make. And even if they were the cult like fanbase would probably mentally retrain their memories to fit with the Trump narrative.

Got to go with the consensus on the thread. Really happy to get Grimes - the experienced CM we've been looking for for ages, but how have we still not got cover/competition for MvE? It's a position with a lot of running and I fear we're going to run him into the ground and end up in a Dabo...

I'd take it that all of them could be shit for a bit with each of them winning a trophy once or twice a decade. Quite enjoying Man City's poor form and wouldn't be amiss to seeing Liverpool do the same next season. I just prefer it being a competition and it's not healthy for a few team to win...

But the important thing is results and the team. We're on a winning run so don't mess with it for individuals (unless said individuals can fit into the system that's working). With players coming back from injury it's best to bring them back in gently with sub appearances. Also with midweek...

Will be a good test for us. I think before we'd have disrupted our own formation by spending too much time worrying about them. Hopefully Frank won't do that and stick with things as they are - I want to see how we get on against the best team in the division playing our natural game. Might swap...

As long as it's no more than ten

'If' is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. It's a nonsense sold by those with shitloads as to why you don;t have and it and why they therefore should. Because if you're a good boy and work hard do you know who benefits the most? The person you work for - not you. You never hear of the millions...

I'd say we've seen far more organisations and people call for the banning of Islam in this country, so I guess we've got no problem then have we.

I think thats ONLY if two candidates have proven equally qualified and able as each other at that point it may be acceptable to prefer a candidate who is from a section of society that is underrepresented or even persecuted. Whereas Trump ability is never even close to being a factor at all...

Well that's a measured response to what I said isn't it! If you wonder why at times some people seem dismissive of your thoughts, it's shit like that. Sensationalist, over the top nonsense that is so implausible it's laughable.

But what is British 'culture'? It is, and always has been, fluid and changing. What someone 100 years ago thought of as British culture would be vastly different to what we see as British culture today, as it would have been 100 years before them . And so it will be in the future as the changes...

But this is not sustainable. You just cannot have perpetual population growth to maintain an ever growing ageing population.

Anyone who blindly disagrees with Labour now but who supported the Tories doing the same thing while in power. I think you fit into that category.

But clearly not the US government...