Search results

Ffs Boddy forcing Ohare to do an interview to get a move away [emoji19] Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

It can't be any worse. Was infuriating. Its like they didn't know how to adjust to a wet pitch Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

Or the technology was correct and is better than grainy pictures on twitter Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

Hyams got 9 Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

Pretty much agree with most of that. I also think as poor as our wing backs crossing is there is a completely lack of bodies and movement in the area when we get the ball wide. I would love to see Hamer or Allen trying to get into the box and support the strikers when the ball is wide but this...

Sorry, completely misread. Agree with you hahah Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

So are you saying the technology wasn't switched on? That's the only argument you can have because if it was on then as soon as the ball crosses the line the refs watch buzzes Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

At no point was the ball over the line. As I said before goal line technology doesn't just take a random picture at any point and that's what they go off. As soon as the whole ball crosses the line the watch buzzes and its a goal. At no point this happened. You literally cannot argue with the...

Don't think the Gyok one is a pen, giving a corner is laughable. I thought the Tavares one was the best shout of all of them Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

David I can see you're understandably frustrated given ours and the referees performance so I'll leave it there. They don't just make the technology up from any random picture. Once the ball crosses the line completely the refs watch buzzes and tells him it's over the line. At no point did this...

Why would the hawkeye be a flawed picture but the grainy twitter picture be 100% spot on? Mate let it go. We were shite and the ball wasn't over the line Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

The results of hawkeye are above on this thread from the side Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

Where has it been pointed out that I'm wrong? The technology gives a scientific yes or no answer to a goal. The answer is no as the whole ball has not crossed the line. Its very simple Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

There's fucking technology with a yes or no answer you fucking twat Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

The technology proved it wasn't a goal. End of Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

There's only once where the technology hasn't worked. It worked today unfortunately for us and it wasn't over the line by millimeteres. Stop letting us nearly scoring a goal off their player's backside deflect away from our poor performance. Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

The worst one was when he refused to give us a pen and so gave us a corner when Ohare headed it behind unchallenged. Either a pen or goal kick. Can't just decide its a corner Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

Have you just chosen to ignore the camera angle above from quest that proves its not a goal? Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

Apologies please Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

No one is fully understanding the rule or understanding camera angles Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk