Are we really suggesting that because Harry Kane took it half a yard further wide, which would have left him 1v1 from the corner of the area with all the time in the world, that it’s not a goal scoring opportunity?
Agree. They’ve absolutely shat the bed. Someone should tell them that polls 42 months from a GE don’t really matter a great deal.
I’ve said before, they feel like they’re still in campaign mode rather than governing mode.
Edit: 42 months, not 30.
Fair. Are there any UK-based podcasts that you would suggest are ‘good’ targets? I’m not aware of a Rogan-equivalent (not that I listen to that, to be honest). So could it be that the UK podcast landscape doesn’t have the same reach/impact?
I’m genuinely curious on this - that was Trump’s (successful) strategy for his presidential campaign. Why are we to assume that it wouldn’t be the case here? I appreciate the ‘party standing’ angle is different but the method of campaigning surely either works or it doesn’t?
Looking solely at the financial markets position, I genuinely don’t see where the government can go. If they cut welfare spending significantly they get the political pressure of acting against their members’ (and many MPs’) beliefs. If they raise main taxes they break a manifesto pledge. If...
So you believe Shoosmiths are complicit in this swindle?
All of the strange bluster seems to be about the valuation being on the IHT threshold, but I’m struggling to see what relevance that has to anything.
Morgan Whittaker is a great case study of that. xG of 11.3 over the course of the 2023/24 season at Plymouth and ended with 20 goals - since that season he’s scored 4 goals, and still yet to score for Middlesbrough in his first 20 games.
Yes, he’s not going to be posting that kind of overperformance but you’d expect he will get at least a couple more free kicks and long-range goals throughout the season, which by their nature are low xG chances.