Search results

its the depreciation of the player transfer fees..... the cost is allocated over the number of years of each contract...... nothing sinister

The one and only SBG :wave: good to see you

Is it me and am i the only one who has yet to see any of the 3 major departees express any real gratitude to the fans that supported them through thick and oh so much thin. Perhaps i missed it but I feel that some expression of thanks to the Sky Blue faithful would not have gone amiss...... do...

Agreed but SISU are protecting their cash flow and hoping AT can do an exceptional job........ next question is what happens if it works and SISU dont go?

Sure i saw it reported that Westwood went to Sunderland on roughly 5 times his CCFC salary - apparently on £25k there but who knows

we can argue about the wages truth is we will never know :D and btw i clean forgot about Osbourne ....... point i was getting across is that we might be losing less per month this coming season and that the actual cash flow requirement is nothing like the monthly losses..... and maybe that will...

thats what happens and i try to be clever with computer progs :D. Salaries are pure guesswork and Doyle went to Sheff Utd half way through. But the principle remains.......... right now SISU have saved on wages and cut their cash requirement

As it stands just how much do we think the club have saved on the wages compared to last year. Here is my stab at it (I have assumed no more signings to come) Carsley say £8k pw £416000 King £10K pw £520000 Westwood £6kpw £ 312000 Gunnarson £5K pw £260000 Doyle £5K pw £260000 Ohalorran £2k pw...

its also called incitement to commit a criminal act.......... and would get the club fined money we dont have ........ but hey you do what you think best

Got to stop focussing on the piece of paper............. bottom line is the offer isnt good enough to even tempt them or ask for more details..... that should tell you that they have the means to hold on because no one wants administration

Only info available is accounts to 31/05/10 so not up to date but no one aside from the Board has the latest figures. Assuming things run in much the same way to answer your queries The £24m loans from the private equity funds managed are not according to the accounts secured and no...

To be honest jan I dont think SISU are bleeding the club dry as you say, but they are refusing to be a bottomless pit of funding. I have a feeling that they are for once taking a risk, and it is a big one They have had to give undertakings that in one way or another there will be funding in...

the article fails to mention that the Championship are looking to adopt new League rules that mean wages will have to be cut so that ALL clubs live within their means. 2010 accounts showed we paid out more in wages than we had income ! We cant go on doing that! I suggest that there is giving...

admire the sentiment, and if people choose to demonstrate in any way they see fit thats fine by me. You know damn well you wont get 15000 + to do it Just be aware of the possible consequences of reducing the clubs income. We are already hovering around administration...... we reduce the one...

"Oh, sorry, no-they're not losing 500k a month, they're "investing" it! Because it's an investment, they get it back later, right? It isn't a loss at all! " OK quick accounts lesson. SISU are putting money into the club at the rate of a reported £500k per month to cover the day to day cashflow...

SISU threw the offer back, partly because of the much publicised lack of headed paper but also I would think because it was nowhere near their expectations GH and his investors have with drawn their offer, stating they will wait for SISU to come to them. Bottom line on the face of it...

Think GH chanced his arm and to be honest dont blame him for doing so. He has a starting place and feel for the current Board and SISU position. If he is serious then he has to up the offer or walk away...... or heaven forbid wait for administration Never been a fan of SISU myself but right...

I agree with the last sentence but the money put in is loans and their money (check the accounts) they are only repaid less if they choose to or if we go into admin. They dont have to accept less because GH or any other potential new owner says so

listen to GH's interview chap GH says he told Dulieu who the backers were so they know already

I dont think its negativity as such Rich87, I think many here would welcome his investors taking over - i do think however there is a lot of disappointment in how its all gone to press and what would appear to simple errors on both sides. Above all I think a lot of people expected him to march...