Search results

Labour frequently make a bad choice of leader out of the candidates we have. At least this time we have made the best choice out of a very average bunch but it isn't a career politician we have chosen. The start of his title should give a clue. He knows more about life than all the Tories put...

No. It is a way of life. In France they think we are strange for not greeting in such a way.

Starmer is now shooting down Boris like I thought he would. Not a hard job to do but at least he looks very able. But I am a little worried about a possible lack of charisma. Not a problem when it is Boris but he will become cannon fodder at some time. The Tories are good at this. Bury bad news...

You don't want to go backwards and forwards but constantly make childish digs. Yeah dude.

I don't have a problem as l9ng as you are not lying again.

Just spoken to wife on the phone (yes even at this time in the morning). Not sure if France is opening back up a bit on Monday now. Macron announced last week it would only happen if new cases were below 3,000. They were over 3,600 yesterday. So everyone now awaits a new announcement later today.

My youngest lad is supposed to start back on Monday and my little girl is supposed to start back a week later. Face masks provided for all children. But everyone has also been given the choice on if they send their children back to school. My wife is keeping our children at home. Two reasons...

What other countries have been as soft as us?

And what I was looking forward to when Starmer was announced as Labour leader. Boris and his one liners will be struggling.

So they signed in with your name? OK.

Our flat pack Labour party leader does seem to be finding his feet.

I would look forward to the enquiry needed if I could think it would be unbiased.

And not strict enough with the measures set.

Even though I quoted you saying so? OK will admit you don't mention your degree although you admitted you have mentioned your degree several times. And I admit you never said that smokers would have more severe effects from the virus although the quote shows you did and your degree was the...

No. I keep pointing out that you said what you are trying to say you didn't.

So not too far behind. That is if we can believe the numbers given.

It is a difficult one. Their lockdown was much tougher than our shutdown. But if our numbers are true we should be about where they are. But how can we take any numbers to be true? As we are 2 weeks behind Italy and Spain we have the advantage of seeing what happens with them as they start to...

You said your degree, which you admitted you keep bringing up, told you smokers with the virus would be in serious trouble. But their fatality numbers seem to be much lower than non smokers. It is all there and clear to see.

But as my guess is we are 2 weeks behind Italy and Spain and a week behind France. What were the numbers in Italy and Spain a couple of weeks ago?

Try reading again what you said yourself. Anyone who smoked and git the virus was in serious trouble. And you know that because of your degree. But the truth looks to be the total opposite. And as usual I get into a stupid argument because someone tries to lie instead of just admitting the truth.