Search results

So are Waghorn's since his injury and covid.

It's hard to disagree with that.

Yet!

I'm just pointing out that just because someone bids a serious amount for a player, it doesn't make it a statement. I thought that was obvious, didn't think I'd have to explain it 😉

We could do that, IF we'd agreed to sell one of our assets for more than £3m after securing a replacement first. Eg, we buy Twine today for £3m, and sell O'hare tomorrow for £4m That would be seen as normal business, hardly a statement of anything.

Lol, well I hope they can come up with a plan B

Thanks for that Tony, it's certainly a policy that's not currently fit for purpose.

Just a random thought, but why can't we process their assylum/immigration request in Calais, that way they might be less inclined to risk life and limb crossing the worlds busiest shipping lane, and might stop them using the services of people traffickers. Those who do then cross the...

Fuck me, I hope they like Rwander!!! I can see why the government might see this as some kind of deterant, but Jesus h christ its no fucking solution!

Seems bizarre, if they are successful in their claim, do we have to pay to fly them back to the UK? And if they are unsuccessful do we then have a responsibility to fly them to their country of origin? If their claims take time, who pays for their stay in Rwanda? Again I can't see this...

He actually looked better at LCB than at LWB at times (not that that's saying much) Watching the Luton away highlights again, I think JCS isn't irreplaceable by any means. I think the fact that MR would of had him on a free, but wasn't willing to pay a signing on fee is as much a sign of how...

They are significantly richer, not necessarily more ambitious.

OK, I get that, then why not just return them to their home state? Any Genuine asylum case can be dealt with through the asylum system (whatever that is) the rest should be treated with humanity and respect while awaiting extradition/deportation to their homeland. OK I know that's very...

And what about those who enter the country with perfectly normal visas, but deliberately over stay?

So what about the ones who they do know are here, presumably the ones who get off boats on the coastline and are apprehended ? Or who are discovered while still in the act of crossing.

So then you'd be an economic migrant? Is that what your saying?

Again, your picking up on words, how about having a bash at answering a few of the straight forward questions? I'm all ears 😉

I meant through non legal means. (Which is again contentious) But if you do arrive unannounced so to say, what do you think is the correct way to deal with these people? Are they asylum seekers or are they economic migrants? Is there even a difference? Should they get preferential access...

I thought that international law said you had to claim asylum in the first safe haven you came to. (Again I may be wrong, I'm no expert, just trying to learn) If your a genuine asylum seeker you shouldn't need to enter under the radar (so to speak)

I didn't say it did, did I?