Search results

Also having done the exercise a little while back during the time that SISU have been here CCFC have made a small profit on transfer fees in and out. During which time the monies loaned to the group and ultimately CCFC in particular have increased. So how is that SISU or their investment funds...

cant be bothered to write this all out again so have cut and pasted from an earlier reply....but these are the facts howzer..... Its a group of companies chap they are all owned by the SISU investment funds .............. SISU funds made loans to the parent company SB S&L which have lent the...

maybe it does just, i dont know and you are very likely right shmmee :), but the value of the old contract that had the transfer fee would immediately be £ nil so the principle is the same - no value to the new contract on the balance sheet

Well technically I think the contract extension is actually a new contract - which would be one that did not include a transfer fee we had paid. The Original transfer fee would have been written down to nil - or would be over the original contract period. The new contract extension doesnt kick...

Bottom line is its my team - out of choice they would be Premiership Champions playing in Europe but they are not. Never want to see them relegated but if they are of course I will continue to support them. My support doesnt come with the caveat of "only if"

think its more about harder to prize away so more likely to push price up. We all know the intention of contracts but we all know they can be broken. It is a way of safeguarding an asset for the club something they failed to do with Conor Thomas last season. Should mean we get to see the young...

all part of what any clever potential new owner would look at shmmmee yes.

all part of how you could put a potential sale value on a player plus other factors like age experience etc yes Nick. But it isnt the figure that appears on the acoounts. eg Gael could be sold at £2m but his value in the CCFC accounts will be £0 because we never paid anything to sign him. Once...

Good news that they have moved to keep him- definitely the right thing to do

No value to contracts for players developed by the club. So no worth shown on the accounts. However the player pool would have a "value" to any potential buyer of the club because they could look at each player and say how much could i sell him for. It is two different things - current...

got to be honest i would be more inclined to cut him more slack as a cov kid but point is he didnt have a great season last year overall and has started poorly this. I hope he turns it around because he can do well if his head is in the right place

I thought that we got 10% of the excess over £3.5m for Dann. If he goes for £10m thats £650k not a million. Plus his fee will have clauses in about the payment, add ons for appearances etc so we wont even see £650k up front

""people dont seem to understand the debts of the club are in a completely different company to the company that sells the players, so the sales amounts go straight to sisus investors"" Its a group of companies chap they are all owned by the SISU investment funds .............. SISU funds made...

First off I have never been a big fan of Sheffers ............ Saturday he was poor, little contribution, off the pace and made a tough game harder for those around him especially Juke.......... however it was only one game and it is how he comes back from that performance that is important...

IF there is a deal it wont be paid upfront........ it will be dependent on appearances, they are not going to pay out millions upfront then get caught out by him breaking down next month. His injury was serious possibly career threatening, they will know that and have full medical disclosure on...

Making the assumption that Turner can return to similar form to last year I think it is a mistake. Of all the centre backs we have he is the only one you would say is big strong and dominant..... comes across as a leader on the pitch and we certainly need that quality. The others have other...

I can not see why anyone would buy a player who has had a series of serious injuries without seeing him play again let alone pay £2-3 million on him. It may happen but I doubt that it will be before Turner proves he is over the injury - as yet he hasnt even played a friendly !

Actually brinner the council said they wouldnt sell the stadium to CCFC unless the owners could prove there was a viable business plan that satisfied the councils criteria. That will be the same for SISU, GH or any other owner

rules for championship not agreed yet One thing that puzzles me is that clubs are taking on players on say 3 year contracts now that kind of fixes the core salaries for a couple of seasons how will that work in respect of living within means calculations. Will clubs be given time to bring...

Mine was ok but my lads wasnt - no apology and was told to get it sorted for next match but surely its the clubs mistake and responsibility to do that. Another PR cock up