Search results

Yeah, we haven't seen any players he scouted for us go on to better things, have we Bantam? :jerkit:

It's just another nail in non-Premiership footballs coffin, though. I don't give a crap about the quality of presentation; I just want to be able to see all the lower league goals and a few highlights. I don't have SKY, and used to watch TFLS 2-3 times each week. I am massively p'd off! :mad:

Sorry, but that is an opinion. That is a fact.

This is a disgrace. I can only hope that a campaign similar to that which saved 6 Music gets the BBC to see sense. Maybe if they cut a few bureaucratic management tiers they may be able to afford programmes that their licence payers want?

"Continue to remain calm. Stay in your seats. Do not panic".

That was after the Turner deal had been agreed. And I agree that it sounds like a decision that SISU deserve defending for. That said, even they must have realised that selling Keogh as well would have made them look even worse than they do already. Still, I don't really care if anyone...

I think I agree to some extent, but can also see that SISU made his job harder. But no, Lord, they didn't make him hire Coleman.

Nah, Thorn was talking about formations and said 1 up front "didn't suit us". And Parsons was definitely talking about 1 up front. Also-he didn't bollock them at h.t. He rightly realised that poor confidence was an issue, and in his words "made the players feel good about themselves" at h.t...

And got 2 crucial goals as sub. Funny player; when he's good, he looks the best we've got. The Blackpool and Bristol sub appearances are for me our best individual showings of the season-I'm not sure he even put a foot wrong in either. Indeed he looks a level above many of our players. Yet the...

There's only one stat that really matters to me; Coventry City 1, Bristol City 0.

The fact that he abandoned it and spoke about how "1 up doesn't suit us" should put your mind at rest ;)

Whilst King facilitated a hell of a lot of it by generally occupying 2 men, I actually thought it was Mcsheffrey who was the "king" (sorry) of movement for us last season; he was finding space constantly. That said, I've always said (as has he) that's he's a striker: look back at his finishes...

Oh goody, analogy time :claping hands: Ah, but all RR had done with SISU until they bought us was a lot of courting; the relationship was never consummated until they bought CCFC. And once they got down to business under the sheets, RR found out he was in bed with sexual deviants, and ones...

I know someone in the know re: Keogh but haven't seen them in a week or so. There will probably be an auction because Swansea are likely to come in for him again. We rejected 1.5m in August, so what do we reckon now after the season he's had; 2m+?

I'm picturing the four of them in Reservoir Dogs-style attire with menacing vibe to match. Keys has to be Mr Pink.

That's how I read it formation-wise, Jack. First half it really didn't work, we had no shape-and it was hard to tell what formation it was, but "a ragged and dishevelled 451" seems to be it. Nobody seemed to know their roles. Possibly the evidence that, actually, we are even worse with other...

Shockingly, no, there isn't. I was quite livid when I found that out.

I loved the idiots on the phone-in who claimed that by switching from the diamond we were better; no, we were much much much much worse. It was going back to the diamond-along with a superb double substitution at H.T.-that turned the game around. Brilliant stuff 2nd half. Can't decide on MOM...

Yeah, fuck it, eh? I didn't even celebrate I'm such a miserable grinch. Why even bother going any more, what's the point?!