Search results

I think I just Yates hiding in my shrubs.

Yup, if its 4, we are truly fucked.

It is possible to produce shirts without sponsorship, Forest started last season with no shirt sponsor.

If he was selling hospitality at a fraction of our rivals he should be sacked just for that.

And many more of our rivals have yet to sign anyone.

A lot depends on Gus. And then the quality of incoming players. Too early to say.

Then you should be more discerning.

Which is highly likely considering we'll be playing a new 2-6-2 formation.

How many are there?

If 20k pays the wages of 2 very good players as some have suggested, I'd still keep Hamer, he's worth 2 very good players.

I can't attend these days because of my health but it looks an absolute hoot up there now. No wonder people are getting hooked.

And if that's true anywhere, its true with wing-backs.

Does it though? It seems to me that in the system we play the wing back roles are crucial and we are yet to get them right, Its obviously a high energy role and ideally you'd want 2 quality player on each side, rather than one and a back up. That way you can effectively rotate, even within...

It's obviously Predator

Hamer and Vik are both off, lets face facts. It doesn't have to be the end of the world, a few years ago we'd heard of neither of them. If a good chunk of the money is reinvested in the team, I'm fine with it.

City of Rugby is it counselors? Fuck you!

That's very true Otis. You twat.

I suppose it depends how shrewd a business man DK is. I have always thought the club is marketed poorly, there is so much more that could be done.

Unfortunately, that is his nature.

Yes I was there... Hanging like a dog though, there was an Arsenal fan in the hotel bar the night before and he just would not stop buying us drinks.