Search results

Scenes again tonight. Very harsh handball given and Man Utd go through.

Right up there with the stupidest things I’ve ever read.

27% is the actual amount. Over a quarter of future earnings now spoken for. CVC seem to want to be getting a 20% annual ROI as well.

Just had a look to see what CVC bring to the table. It seems under their ownership F1 was being run into the ground until Liberty Media bought them out and turned it around. Probably not the type you’d want to have a stake in your league.

Which is fine if the council were a corporate body, but part of the argument is can a public body like the council carry such prejudices when dealing with public assets?

Surely when it comes to photos of ‘87 and Wembley and suchlike people on here have photos they’d be happy to share for the benefit of this? I don’t really take photos so I’m useless for it, but some must.

My question around the report that was put out was that it indicates the ground sale and lease extension were indeed one transaction. Had that not been argued long ago? Both were agreed in conjunction with each other, whilst the council have been adamant they were separate transactions. Was that...

Impractical given the time constraints, but really like the idea.

SISU apologist.

And he doesn’t work for the council. Cheers Nicky.

And I saw that one of the supposed conditions were that AEHC were to assist with CCFC-related charitable programmes (or something along those lines). What was so offensive about that?

If that was indeed said, it screams to me that Wasps cannot afford to run it on their own.

How we not winning boooooo Robins out

There is talk within the notes around Going Concern basis that the directors are confident of a deal to play next season, but are also looking at a range of options. Clear that they are looking further afield than Coventry to me, going against Fisher’s previous comments.

Don’t know whether that tweet has now refreshed with it being embedded but what are you guys referring to?

The problem with things like this though is that fans of other clubs just think “oh, they’ve got shit owners who are killing the club”. There’s no context to what is happening and the owners are not the only obstacle (they are twats though). I don’t recall hearing the Sky Sports commentators...

Look, I’m not saying what has happened is deserved. It isn’t. I think it’s ridiculous. The people who knew him should not be involved in it and I’m very intrigued as to how this was found out.

Odds on the onus falling on the freeholder (conveniently)?

Whilst I agree that Nick is a moany bastard about a lot of things, there have been some excellent ideas provided in this thread and yet none of them have been responded to and this has popped up. All for it if it makes people feel a bit better about the situation, but it’s not exerting any...

My thoughts exactly (save the Chitty ChittyBang Bang stuff). They’re not a real estate company and they would have to manage the rent at a sustainable level for the club or risk having an asset that will need maintenance etc carrying out and no income streams. Then consider the yield that they...