Search results

And? Ffs you'd have thought people would have learned there lesson by now

Gonna be a tough game, inconsistent away form + missing players + new manager response for them. I'd go with --------RCC Ricketts--Martin--Johnson--Stokes ----------Vincelot--Fleck Lameiras-------------------Murphy ------------Tudgay--Fortune

I'd agree with taking a draw, inconsistent away form and missing players.

Its no surprise one of the first thing Mowbray does was bring in a trusted friend to sort out the scouting

Vincelot was rested as well, Stokes has been carrying his knock for weeks and playing through the pain, would expect him to continue to do so. I would be surprised to see any of them miss out tbh, think Mowbray may have been over exaggerating a bit as he kept saying it was pretty his strongest...

I'd have faith in Mowbray to replace them, never had the same faith in Pressley. This team now is largely a team Mowbray has built over preseason, Pressley inherited his team and had no idea how to rebuild.

Same as most teams, the worry isn't that we have only one player getting the bulk of goals. The worry is that the player is Armstrong who could be going back in January, I have faith in Mowbray though to replace him if we do lose him.

Ok answered that in my response to Otis, it could be or it couldn't don't know as I'm not knowledgeable on the criteria on which appeals are granted.

Ricketts misses knocked out

Which one again? I don't know the process for lodging appeals and the criteria for which they are granted so can't say, could be rather a bit of a formality with flimsy evidence or evidence that isn't directly relevant to the point at hand but they have to allow it to be heard to cover there...

That's the thing though, he is is in the black/wrong area at the moment. It was decided he was in the wrong, its up to him and his team to prove otherwise and until they can he remains in the wrong.

And equally we don't know the evidence is significant either

The law is fairly black and white though, you can't partly or half rape someone. Is the law fair in that it doesn't consider grey areas? Maybe not but you need clear definitions for it to work properly.

Great save by RCC

Selling to SISU didn't fit in with their plans. Its ironic because I'm fairly certain had Wasps proposed the same idea Higgs would have thought it was a great idea and people on here would be waxing lyrical about it about how great they were interacting and engaging with the local community.

And has she won big? What is it, 5 name changes in the last few years now? Yea she clearly done it for her own personal gain.

Some people believe rape has to be a violent knife point attack down an alleyway. If you want the long story short here is basically what happened. Macdonald met a drunk girl on a busy street outside a takeaway and she willingly went back to his hotel room in a taxi, they went back to the...

Because imo he didn't understand the law. Is ignorance an acceptable excuse to a crime?

Evans and Macdonald both remember what happened, he essentially convicted himself with his own testimony from what I'm led to believe, there was no physical evidence sex took place as far as I know other than Macdonald and Evans testimony and the hotel porter who heard moans/groans from outside...

We don't know what that evidence is though, could be something important and game changing or it could be grasping to straws from Evans. Then even so there is the scenario that the evidence is enough to get the conviction overturned doesn't automatically make her a liar, depending on what the...