Search results

Seriously??? You called me cerebrally challenged after you completely made a tit of yourself by not managing to read 2 simple paragraphs. Then instead of just admitting you misread it, you doubled down on your stupidity, and tried to insult me!!! There's only one person on here who needs help.

Your flogging a dead horse mate, he's as thick as two short planks.

Are you really that thick? Go and ask one of your teachers to read it for you. Is English not your first language or are you mentally challenged?

I did read it, hence the quote! Wasn't that a big enough clue for you? It also says Forest prefer a sale rather than a loan, and his wages are an issue. So obviously you read that and expect an announcement at 5pm 🤣🤣🤣

Ffs mate, what part of " the club switching their attention to other options" made you think that this was back on?

She's definitely going to get a stiff one.

Let Canon and Simms fight for the shirt

Was at Everton with Simms before joining Leicester. But would surely cost too much money, but would definitely have him if Doug can prize him away from the inbreds.

Well the alternative to controlling the numbers is open borders with no checks or controls, would you be in favour of that?

Or maybe the government needed to deliver what they promised.

Well maybe he has a point? Out of interest how much immigration would you say is acceptable? Should we have open borders and unchecked movement?

It was about taking control of immigration from the EU (freedom of movement) AND not having Brussels telling us how many non EU migrants we had to take. It's since come to pass that we're more than capable of fucking things up ourselves.

Trust me, it has nothing to do with Farage, I'm a little more sofisticated than that. Government corruption and incompetence plays a massive part, but if Labour is the answer we'll all be more than happy with things in a couple of years or so.

Well that's certainly one theory. However I'd suggest that the populous was already unhappy about the impact of immigration long before Brexit. Brexit was the outcome of that frustration, the fact that we havnt had the desired outcome of brexit is down to this government's incompetence...

I don't doubt it, but it also happened under Blair if I remember correctly, and I don't see it improving under Labour.

Too many is when the net migration numbers result in a breakdown of our infrastructure, (which we are already seeing in the NHS) and when the burden on the treasurey results in or contributes to dramatic cost cutting to public spending and/or excessive tax rises which impacts families...

Why on earth would I want to ban legal migration? That makes no sense at all. Migration is vital, it's just the numbers that are currently unsustainable. But nice one jumping to the wrong conclusion. You'll be calling me a racist next, that's what usually happens when reasonable debate...

Quite the contrary.

Success would be our government (specifically the treasurey i guess) having some form of control over net migration levels. You can't expect any organisation to keep a tight grip on budgets when the demands arnt known and therefore can't be costed.

All the things you mention are relevant, but if we control the numbers the impact can be calculated and costed. (Although we've done a piss poor job so far) With no control we have no chance of maintaining a functioning infrastructure.