Search results

Then why waste so much of your valuable time trying to discredit my opinion? Unless you're just a bit weird of course.

You're priceless. The question was regarding the advances in the last 10 years. Which you earlier agreed had advanced. Now you jump on board against your own opinion in order for a cheap poke at your new perceived threat. I'm flattered.

I hazard a guess at yes. If they're doing it in the second tier in the US, it's reasonable to assume they're doing it in the third tier in England.

Ingestible and wearable computer tracking, carbon nanotechnology, Fluid dynamic tracking, surgery (recovery time) advances .... ...it isn't all about laps and cones anymore. Everything is tracked, monitored and planned. Players are expected to have specific levels of fitness via the data...

Now you're takin' the piss.

So gym equipment, computers and the resulting analysis hasn't changed in a decade? Righto. My mistake.

According to some, nothing's changed :D

Here, the will to win is driven by a favorable seeding (who you'll end up playing) and home field advantage.

For what it's worth, I agree with this sentence. Stop feeling threatened, stop the aggressive stance and the pathetic attempts at trying to demean and discredit. All I want is to garner (crowbar) a response to a valid question. The truth is, neither you, or I know the truth behind Cole's...

Grendel. Rather than answering a simple question, you chose to spend a good half hour trawling through the SBT archives to find something that doesn't end up supporting your false accusation against me. Then you still don't answer the question, saying it's 'irrelevant', only to ask the...

lol ....you sure showed me :D It's as relevant as asking why (you think) Hunt was fit? Is it not?

You're all over the place. First you refuse to answer why Cole wasn't fit, on the grounds that it's 'irrelevant'..... ....only to ask why Hunt was ? The answer to both, I proffer, is you don't know. Try and focus all this nervous energy I've obviously stoked within you towards...

So, staying on the facts (as uncomfortable as you are with it)... * There was no thread entitled 'All time worst Coventry Player.' * I didn't say Peter Atherton was our 'All time worst Coventry player. I said, he was one of our 'Below average at best' centre backs. Grendel, this clamor...

Oh dear....I expected better than this from you. I get four paragraphs of nonsense and an assumption in reply to one question. I'll ask again, just for kicks. Do you know the details behind Cole's lack of fitness ?

What part of can don't you understand ?

So, no. You don't know why Cole was so unfit. Good grief.

'Clown' I'm getting the very best of you today. I can't recall a thread entitled 'All time worst Coventry players'.

I understand I may be on your radar, but you getting upset on the internet doesn't validate your point. Do you have inside knowledge on the reason behind Cole's lack of fitness?

I think you'll find, if you read what I said, I clearly stated that you can compare players that played in different leagues, in different decades. However, it was my opinion that it's not a valid comparison. Now you're choosing to throw me another?

I believe most do. Some, like Tudgay, said that he understood that he was squad player and would make sure he was fit and available when called upon.