Search results

I get where you’re coming from but stick a business head on for a minute - the prize money and ticket sales (which most could have guessed roughly) probably wouldn’t have been sufficient to cover players’ appearance bonuses, let alone win bonuses. Maybe there is a business case for not...

Well, that’s me reassured.

The fact that Fadz is getting old has hardly crept up on us, has it? If he’s feeling the pace after one game then maybe we need more CBs than I thought.

That’s mad. A long read, but mad.

…for now.

Would have been interesting to trial it in the competition. The amount of surveying EFL did on streaming opportunities last season suggested to me that it was going to become more widespread. Seems not, so far at least. Even if it was the same ticket price, or for away games only, or whatever...

Gah, couldn’t tell you that - it was 3 years ago!

I remember when the leisure centre used to open up their sports hall as a bar on matchdays, but don’t think they do that any more.

May have changed, certainly. But thinking back to his first spell here, I recall a Sunday game we played and he was awful. And I know for an absolute fact he was out in Birmingham the night before smashing down bottles of Hennessy. Here’s hoping he has changed, eh?

Saw that this morning. What kind of world do we live in?!

That’s quite a shove on an old woman. Don’t care how much of a bellend she’s being.

And what about on match days?

Getting rid of Walker would be mind bending.

And yet I’m sure that Messi could still earn through sponsorship deals, etc. Besides, found out yesterday that La Liga has a rule that any contract offered cannot be less than 50% of the previous wage. Hence the reason this situation has come about. Seems a bit mad.

Liked the idea of it being played after the game, rather than the entrance music to be honest.

They were questioning on the highlights whether he meant that touch. I just recall his quick feet last season for Hamer’s goal v Blues.

But it’s mad. Loans should be the preserve of either (a) the star quality that you have little chance of affording on a permanent basis, or (b) structuring of deals that may turn into permanents, like Sheaf/Chaplin. If we’re using loan positions to fill gaps in the squad on the basis of cover...

You’re surely not telling me that Portsmouth didn’t have high hopes for Richard Duffy?

Yes, and it was as stupid then as it is now. You have a cap on loanees, so why would you be loaning a player in who will either sit on the bench or cause one of your other loanees to sit on the bench? It’s idiotic.

Uber Eats and their lack of a complaints process. Fucking hell, I’ve been robbed of £20.