Interesting, unfortunately paywalled, article on Bloomberg that counters the 'you can't tax the super rich they'll all leave' narrative with a real world example
You can invest without going crazy. There's players in the squad you'd think could step up and there's players you would say are useful to keep around as squad players.
But if you think you can go up and keep the exact same squad you're asking for trouble.
I've got no problem with changing the law around this but if you did that would you not have to make some provision for existing marriages?
What do countries that have already outlawed this do when a married couple tries to move there?
what about the concourse? if you move the fence do you have to change the setup in there?
I'm guessing its not as simple as that. Kings is pretty on the case with anything that can make money so I doubt he's leaving a whole block empty that could be sold.
You'd need to dig down a lot more into the data I think and find out what jobs we're talking about.
Its definitely true that there are whole sectors where British workers are very reluctant to take jobs but that's a problem nobody wants to try and solve seeing as any suggestion of improving...
Don't you have to allow 10% for away supporters? That would be 3,261?
How many do we allocate at the moment, is there much scope to open up more blocks to home supporters even if you ignore the need to reconfigure the concourse.
That's being charitable. Kermode said something like it was the worst film of the year, but would be number one next week and that was one of the better reviews!
Deadline reporting its on course to lose Disney over $130m
tbh its not really a strong franchise. The Deadline article points out...