Search results

We even have a fucking build to rent sector, homes built to act as somebody's investment primarily

I'm not saying remove their vote, I'm saying that targeting their vote is a problem. Today's decisions often have consequences far beyond their lives.

Perhaps if we had decent care and pensions we wouldn't have such a spiteful boomer bloc. That said, then again, they were all beneficiaries of something more akin to cradle to grave socialism and have decided that the young deserve nothing like that. I'm pretty sympathetic to your view, the...

It comes from the same discredited household budget analogy

He creates more space for others as well out wide

We're in the top 6 already mate, piece of piss

It's just a completely dumbed down country, run and reported on by the same clique of privileged dickheads.

It's similar to Starmer's line on Natalie Elphicke

The snippet i heard on the radio news this morning suggested that Labour's response to the idea, instead of asking what the actual point of it was and what it was seeking to achieve, was to say it was 'uncosted'.

Home from home [emoji3059]

Yes, he got married to a model

I don't think we will

It's funny how things have moved on - people on average wages driving about in Range Rovers now

Not that it proves anything but interesting that the women and maternity unit at the Countess is in the New Hospitals Programme.

Celtic have got a turnover of £119m without PL money and some of the additional sponsorship / commercial income it attracts. They would be top 5 commercially in the PL with PL money and way ahead of any Championship club minus parachute payments.

Anyway, the judgement should be on what they do or say they're going to do, not who they are.

I don't particularly like Starmer and think he comes across as insincere more because of the elaborate attempts to sound working class, but a toolmaker is in my view working class, whether he's self employed or not. As far as I'm concerned, anybody dependent on payment for their labour directly...

A real chicken and egg scenario coming for the next government, how are household budgets going to be at least repaired?

I assume that the act referred to only extends as far as pensions relating to his role as DPP and not any pension? If it does only relate to being DPP, it's doubtful he'd ever reach that threshold anyway?