Search results

So can you explain to me why Wasps will want to do anything hostile to the football club? Also Wasps owning the Ricoh has made no difference whatsoever to the clubs income streams.

They weren't based in the city at the time. Why didn't CCFC make an offer it the last 7 years?

The Ricoh would be too big for Cov Rugby though.

1. What is the evidence that makes some people think the ccc-higgs-wasps deal is great? Sisu’s plan is there for all to see: they have cut costs so are not making major losses; short-term contracts mean they can liquidate if needs be; and they get an occasional windfall from selling young...

Why don't the club buy a piece of land somewhere and build an exhibition centre on it? That would be a lot cheaper than building a new stadium and the team could continue to play at the Ricoh under a rent agreement. 365 days a year income they say is what's needed. So why build a stadium...

For the same reason Mr Fisher said they were worth nothing. Seller will big it up, buyer plays it down.

I was thinking the same. If a major venue such as the Ricoh can only generate £750k a year, what chance would some little tin shed in the sticks have of generating significant revenue? All serious events and exhibitions in the area will still be held at the Ricoh and nowhere else.

I think some people are a bit judging of Wasps owners based on our experience of hedge funds. In an ideal world I wouldn't have something like a hedge fund anywhere near a sports club. However, just because Sisu have been incompetent, that doesn't mean that Wasps owners would be. I am sure not...

Those are good points but surely no different to the situation we're in now? I.e. what happens if Sisu favour another investment over CCFC and divert funds there?

What were you demanding for 7 years ago?

I'm just curious as to why a team surviving on an average crowd of 14k suddenly NEEDS 25k-30k to survive.

The hope is the club would end up owning a share of the ground.

Well they've managed OK without gates of that size for the past 100 years.

If I was I'd like to think I wouldn't go around making up stories about innocent people.

No. What I am saying is a woman that cries rape against innocent people (as she did against Clayton McDonald) needs to think about what they are doing. Imagine if you were accused of something like this? "Trouble is, mud sticks and I have found it very difficult for a club to take me on. I was...

I asked "Is it so wrong to ask why she did that?" You replied "Yes it is". Sounds like your all for restricting what I can and cannot say on this subject to me. She went back to the room with Clayton McDonald, whom she then made false allegations of rape against. If, as a young lad, an...

Ah ok, so I have no right to discuss a major new story. Where have I said she had no right to decide who she has sex with? You call me a dinosaur, yet you seem to want to stifle debate. Why are you so scared to talk about something like this?

Agree. Its something we as a football club can do without right now.

Yes that is something that we know for certain.

Not necessarily.