Search results

Germany and Italy have more statutory protections for tenants, minimum terms and limits to rent increases, and other rent controls in certain cases. Is the Tory saying these are a good idea?

Buying a sandwich with a mayonnaise based filling that's also got margarine on the bread [emoji2961]

I can't remember if they got this kind of scrutiny before, I'd suggest that they've had many ministers who hadn't a clue about the detail of anything but were allowed to pontificate anyway

He posts on here

No they don't

We received £32m for Gyokeres and Hamer: MVE £3.5m Saka £1.2m Simms £3.5m Wright £7.7m Kitching £4m Thomas £2m Torp £2m EMC £5m Collins £0.6m £30.5m Plus undisclosed signing on fees + agents fees. I'd say that the money has long gone.

Ditto grass verges

Why? What problem is it solving? The problem it creates is larger than the one it solves

All nationalities of domestic football will. The whole idea isn't even aimed at Europe

The difference is that they don't have a lot of the media on their side now, so things suddenly start to get noticed. In the 2019 election Boris Johnson said all kinds of demonstrably untrue rubbish but it was glossed over because the media focused on the opposition.

Would make sense as they've taken some space in Friargate.

Those numbers are brilliant if true, I naively thought they would struggle to hit those numbers again nevermind go beyond.

The issue constantly talked about on here is treating the government budget's like that of a household, I simply disagree with it. Can you show me where I've advocated for government ownership of anything that isn't usually government owned in more prosperous countries than this one?

Yeah, definitely remember doing some sort of Oil Barron joke what with him being from the centre of the UK's oil production as well

Alright Darren Grimes I am not sure why you believe I am advocating an entirely centrally planned economy owned by the state, I have never said anything like that. Though I do believe in state provided public service and utility provision, like the significant majority do in this country.

1. The government 'prints' or moreover creates at a strike of a key every single penny it spends, all of it. It uses tax and selling bonds (not borrowing the money) as a (demonstrably not very effective) way to manage inflation by removing money from circulation in the economy. 2. As long as...

I'm sure the note was a serious statement. How can a sovereign currency issuer run out of money? Please explain to me mr high-minded?

In the fantasy world where the government is dependent on tax and borrowing to pay for its day to day spending, how does it practically work? Given that a lot of tax isn't paid daily? How does the government pay for things today based on hypothetical taxes paid today?

Have you seen the state of the country you stupid tory c**t

Cheap money has fuelled the house price boom but without it for capital purchases like cars and expensive household goods, the economy would be in an even worse state. The government does not need the private sector to raise capital, jesus wept.