Search results

I could do it during the daytime ;)

I'm just making the argument about the commerical sense of doing so. I'm not going to start firing e-mails off to the cluub to complain or stand outside the stadium with a placard FFS. I don't get why you think you should be entitled to more. Even the first dibs isn't a 'given'. It's not...

I was talking about the logic behind it rather than if I'd do it. Like I said certain items I think should be lower tax or tax free. More expensive luxury items yes I'd consider a rate increase.

Why does it have to be more than that? It is a reward for your loyalty.

But then you're edging into "why pay any tax at all and just let people spend what they want and let the private sector grow from the extra expenditure". It's been shown time and time again that doesn't work. I'm all for zero or reduced percentage on items that are necessities but anything else...

The reward for loyalty is getting first dibs on tickets.

From a logical point of view it makes more sense. You only pay the tax when you spend the money. You can only spend the money if you've got it. Therefore the more money you have the more tax you pay. Often wondered if they might consider bringing in bands for VAT, so the higher the value of the...

But you said a kids ST should go free if an adult ST is bought. So these kids are already going as they have ST's and have the chance to get hooked. If you're arguing it will make some new fans because of the name then that should be non kids ST holders get a free ticket. I've said for a while...

Yes

They get rewarded by getting every league game at a much reduced price to a matchday ticket. They should also get rewarded by having first dibs when tickets go on sale. They should not, IMO, get rewarded with a cheaper price to everyone else.

Why should a person that gets a discounted price ticket also get a free kids ticket for a game that should generate a lot of interest?

Players might need a rest AFTER playing the derby.

Overall the changes are far more professional than in the past. Yes, the changes have been big and will largely take some time to have an effect but long term they should be better. If I was to list my main concerns: How soon towards the new season before we decided to change the coaching...

I was working on someone saying he was happy to come back on a 1+1 basis. With the wages, of course no-one knows what the actual figures are, but rumours of what Palmer's wage was and that being asked by James suggest there is enough of a difference to offer a decent signing on fee and still be...

Might be too late by then. The midfield without Sheaf does not look anywhere near strong enough and it completes negates any benefit of having a huge amount of striking talent as they never get the ball enough. Had you said Matty James while the window was still open I'd have said not a chance...

They've spent some time in the sunshiiiiine.

I was at Linkin Park's last ever gig with Chester. I will not be sullying that memory.

I'd have thought someone like James would just be taking Palmer's wage and so shouldn't overly affect finances that were already in place for a new CM.

Seems a bit weird. When I started going I was in the east terrace and my eyes were barely at pitch level standing on an old crate. Perhaps that should have been called the Somme?

That happens with age.