Search results

Yes, but never been likely to actually be involved. I think his moment is coming though, now he is an MP. And the fact that this is either your opinion (or something you know from your contacts in the party) and in that time you've got more and more involved in it, doesn't look good on you.

Well I couldn't give fuck what he thinks about Lampard. What's his view on the changes to IHT?

I really don't know what your signature move is, though I suspect it would be banned in 46 states.

Why do I have a sneaking suspicion that even if that were to happen and a new leader came in, you'd instantly find a reason to complain about them, regardless of who it was.

If you can't get the extra, you could try buying two tickets but leaving a seat in between the two (if it lets you). Bit less likely to be bought then. As it's away and sometimes the seat given is taken as a suggestion people might just buy it anyway, especially if demand is high.

Indeed. Plamer has spent his career at numerous clubs as a bit part player. Maybe when every club that signs you ends up not playing you maybe it's not them that's the problem.

And another. Weaponising of the justice system yet the right in the US have loaded the Supreme Court with their picks (denying Obama a pick that was by right his) and now passing a load of right-wing legislation. And wait until next year and see how Trump uses it then. Or have you not been...

That is some of the funniest shit I've ever read. 'centre left' are deep establishment yet almost all the institutions are run by the (centre) right. The US doesn't even have a left. It's centre right vs right. Then to talk about more likely to be involved in dodgy business and fail to mention...

and also starve. British farming could not meet the demands of the population.

It's a real shame that you haven't noticed it being done for your whole lifetime by all governments regardless of political persuasion.

At what point do we have to start cancelling fixtures to fit in FA Cup games? Basically get to that point and go out in a gutsy performance to a top team. Don't want too much of a cup run this year because I fear we're too close to danger to have it causing fixture congestion.

Personally I'd go Dovin MvE Thomas Kitching Bidwell* Eccles Rudoni Sheaf Saka Simms EMC If Bidwell isn't fit enough I'd be tempted to throw a curveball and try Binks there instead of Dasilva.

Indeed. f you hire a Head Coach rather than a Manager, then you have to expect them to get more out of what they've got.

It doesn't sound like being told how to live our lives. It sounds like encouraging behavioural change, probably using public information bulletins and some changes to the legal and tax system to encourage certain behaviour and discourage others. Which is exactly what every government does. Not...

I'm not saying these clauses don't exist, I'm saying they shouldn't be enforceable in certain circumstances. If your employer chooses to let you go any clauses about not working for someone else should be null and void. hence why you often get gardening leave. Bit like the Bosman ruling. You...

You could play two 6's (Sheaf and Eccles) with Rudoni in an 8. You don't need to have a 10, especially if you have thee attacking players in a 4-3-3. Torp might be able to play 10. Or as an 8 with two 6's. What I didn't understand at the start of the season was why Torp was playing the more...

But are you willing to essentially forfeit games just on the belief that Simms will become good again if you keep playing him?

You can also add in EMC, who can only play on the left as well. I think Wright could possibly still work as a striker, just as long as you allow him to run into channels. Also agree with the other poster saying Rudoni is an 8.

So we can't trust Doug King's word then ;)