Search results

Only people with a certain amount of points to be allowed in the naughty blocks if that keeps the Health & Safety lot happy, but they would have to be on sale from the start so those people know its an option.

6000 West Ham fans breaking safety rules by overcrowding the south stand

The question perfectly exposes their statement for the nonsense that it is. That stand has been completely sold out, from block 6 right across to 12 on several occasions. Are they admitting that on those occasions they violated safety rules? As for block 13, it’s not even part of the same...

I don't think the concourse is the issue with 13, as the entrance to 13 is via the same concourse as the rest of the East Stand

It’ll be 29k (assuming they don’t suddenly find another empty block in the North Stand) 27k City, 2k Boro

I mean the fact it’s run as a committee of all vested parties is a very sensible idea. It’s just some of the conclusions it comes to that I would question. Certainly it would be interesting to know who is representing CCFC and how good their debating skills are.

Thanks for answering. So not an all powerful SAG or Frasers after all then.

Thats was because Wasps had gone bust! It wasn't part of the agreement

There is still the stadium ownership situation though. I think until that is sorted until something more permanent we're unlikely to see another take over

I can't believe you actually think we would sign a licence agreement that would give Mike Ashley the power to bankrupt the club if he felt like it!! We already know that SAG have no power of enforcement, so they can't "tell" them not to open any parts of the ground. Just because someone says...

I can't figure what you're saying. Do you think Frasers can reduce our capacity at games to zero if they wanted? Yes or no?

No they haven't. I've never seen once the club say "we disagree with this but it has been enforced upon us". Do you really think Doug King has given Mike Ashley the power to reduce our attendances to zero? Even I don't believe CCFC would be that incompetent

All I want is the club to acknowledge its responsibilities, that is all. If its taken the advice of SAG, then explain why. If its signed a licence agreement with Frasers that allows Mike Ashley to limit our capacity and starve the club of income at the drop of a hat, explain why. This...

Its called the Safety Advisory Group. Organisations with the power of enforcement against private companies do not have the word "Advisory" in their name. Their job is to advice on how to ensure spectator safety, nothing else. I suspect you're confusing them with the council, who issue the...

Why did you answer it in such a confusing way? You think the SAG have ultimate responsibility then?

So the Club then? Glad we got there in the end

You're right, it isn't that hard. Who has ultimate responsibility for matchday safety?

I think some people on here believe that. Almost like it’s a privilege that the club allow us to watch

A reasonable explanation for most part, bit about block 13 makes no sense though

Great. So no points deductions for us then if we go on the pitch. It’s all down to ACL, and nothing to do with CCFC