Search results

You can do batter than that surely.

Nope, this is all just down to a poster who just can't spell syphilis

It is, because who in their right mind has heard of "cab start attacks?" That's definitely nonsense alright.

Or the next 5 letters of the alphabet either

Yeah, I thought we bossed it completely in that second half, UNTIL they scored. Then we just seemed stunned and rather clueless. Stoke really and truly, did not look like they would ever score in the second 45 mins We weren't ruthless enough though

The weird thing is, for the first two minutes we went for the throat with them and could have easily scored. So, it started out all okay It was then the following 43 mins that went completely wrong.

How weird is that!! Just as I read your post, I was playing this.. That's scary. 😳😱

Yeah, but just you wait til you are 60 and get grumpy all over again.

Has to be We should definitely be challenging around the top 6.

He only had 62 mins How early are you expecting it? 😂

Not sure we should be expecting anyone to make an instant impact to be honest. Some hit the ground running and others, take a little while to settle in. Just the nature of the beast.

Yeah, completely agree. I am saying the goal, which was totally against the run of play and totally out of the blue, completely changed the game. We hadn't had a shot on target, but we in control and starting to prise them open a bit. It's all ifs and buts isn't it That goal obviously...

Yeah, agree. We allowed Stoke so much space on that first half and they were pushing through midfield with ease. Their movement was very good, which helped, but we didn't half allow them a lot of space for sure. The Torp/Allen combination just didn't work. Allen is a bit lightweight and Torp...

Didn't someone on here say he ISN'T the answer? Same thing stands. We won't know until he pulls a City shirt on. We weren't sure on Hamer when he was signed either were we. The game, like you say, isn't played on paper, or judged by a few YouTube videos. I would say, let's see if we get...

No, very true, but look at how the game was going. Stoke were well on the back foot and we held possession and were starting to stretch them. Without that goal coming completely out of the blue, there was only one side that was going to win that. We were looking a bit more dangerous and were...

True, but a draw would have been a much fairer result. Stoke were the best side in the first half for sure, but in the second, we totally controlled the game, had them on the back foot and their barely got out of their own half The goal came completely out of the blue and totally against the...

Oh, that's a coincidence, because I predicted that you wouldn't make a prediction.

That's all I saw.

Has to be top 6 as far as I am concerned.

https://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/victor-torp-and-mark-robins-reflect-on-coventry-citys-defeat-against-stoke-city-%F0%9F%8E%99%EF%B8%8F.161657/