I'm also wondering if the clause in the original deal still applies in that the owners would pay a super rate if it performed over a certain threshold,my take is it would have been negotiated out in the many changes of ownership?
I was actually more impressed by the first,to actually take it in and toe poke on the outside of his boot into the corner rather than across the goal was exemplary thinking for me!
I think the main reason for Fraser's not doing something like this would be logically other events, they went as far as the set up outside,too much effort involved possibly?