Search results

This would appear to be an important point. Seems like we tried to squeeze extra games in before the ground was to be made available - I doubt we have a leg to stand on. I bet there's some BSing going on here...

It didn't occur to me previously that sisu don't need to own the ground themselves for it to be a big asset. The ground is worth a good deal less without a team to play there and suddenly it's the club, as sitting tenants, that becomes valuable in the equation if Wasps are essentially bust...

Exactly - they'll be moaning as usual!

I live in Yorkshire now but my kids 14 and 10 are both Sky Blue down the middle. Matty Godden rules here :)

I had only two school mates who were Vile fans - lovely lads, both of them would scrap for you too.

I grew up in Kenilworth in the 70s, I reckon probably half the kids at school supported the City at the time and the rest glory hunters.

Don't slag off our own fans mate. There aren't too many who can take 40k to Wembley for L2 playoffs (see Exeter)

Why? There's nothing else at all around mid-Warwickshire.

Ok slipped to 11th apparently, I wasn't aware https://www.thegeographist.com/uk-cities-population-100/

Being less supported (apparently) than Burnley - a small town of some 70k with "Bastard Rovers" just down the road.

What are your excuses?

We're the 10th biggest city in the country - Burnley can only dream of our fan base

Must win game already, at least mustn't lose - it will likely set the tone for the early part of the season. They'll be a tough test, rested and at full strength. I'd take a draw at that hell hole but 0-3 would be so much better :)

The problem with saying this player or that player can go is about who will come in. The squad was threadbare last season, We relied heavily on Kane and when fit he was unplayable at times, much more useful that Dabs a lot of the time as it turned out. We collapsed in the league from 2nd to...

That's the sad truth of it. Fantastic news for now but it's probably not so good for the club that there hasn't been stronger interest in our top players - so far.

Why isn't Palmer reinvestment - does he not count or is it because we've already got him? We've got 2 defenders for JCS, somebody to come for Maatsen. We've lost Jones and Shippers, which might give him a little bit to play with but we've 'gained' Tyler back so that's some of his salary too.

Certainly! The wage budget won't be higher than last season and Robins, rightly, wants a bigger squad. That means more nippers and slightly less experience

I think Palmer will be on a decent wage - especially coming on a free

I hope so but let's see. Maybe the equation changed when Tyler reported back. I'm guessing that he (Tyler) might play on the left later in games as in the Forest match...

I think he's possibly already got Palmer.