Search results

Not if there using the club to offset losses?

Thanks. I'd happily take CCC on in a debate. I've debated with Ainsworth. I think IMO I make good points and they are reasoned and thought out. So if anyone from CCC is reading this and wants to debate, let me know.

I assume you mean take the council on in a debate? Why would I or you be on a hiding to nothing?

Answer with my full quote please. You say SISU don't want to fund the club but Wasps owners fund Wasps, yet they are using money they have borrowed which is secured against the stadium. Therefore no risk to the owner of Wasps. So the owner of Wasps, like SISU, is not funding the club. The...

Wouldn't fully fund the club. So are you saying they would partially?

Surely if they have borrowed money to fund Wasps, then they too like SISU, are not funding the club? I would suggest Wasps reasons for moving to the Ricoh was for the stadium to provide extra money to enable Wasps to be self funding? So if that is right, what is the difference between Wasps and...

Fund the club with no income or fund the clubs losses?

Take who on in a debate?

Yeah, it would have meant the football club we support would have a home. It would mean we wouldn't have a London rugby team competing with our cities rugby team. What a disaster that would have been. *I am not for one moment saying SISU wouldn't charge us rent or try and mortgage it or any...

I didn't say NOPM. I don't think that will get rid of SISU. If as people say, they are using the club to offset losses, why would the club making losses bother them? As people have said they will cut the budget, that affects the team. If they still make a loss, they don't mind as they use it to...

I'd like us to get to the 3rd round and get a home draw, against a big team. Be interesting.

No, I split what you said in half, being realistic. For the club to grow, with or without SISU, at the Ricoh or Timbuctoo. They need regular numbers so to budget for the season and ideally be in a position to not sell players. Allowing consistency within the squad and a greater chance of...

30000? Consistently? Through thick and thin? I'd say more 15000 with potential of up to 30000 for big games/if team are doing well.

I see the usual suspects are out in force.

What if they don't? What if there as hellbent on a city of rugby then as they are now? What if destroying ccfc is about making sure wasps succeed and not much to do with sisu? What if it's about justifying their decision?

Would you like me to point out if sisu hadn't taken us over we wouldn't exist? Or would that just be me being melodramatic like you are? As for your abuse. It just nullifies your opinion. So say what you want. You just show yourself up.

Eloquent as ever.

Oh and acl maximising revenue is the truth? Ainsworth admitted the council/acl hadn't been rin very well and needed new owners. It's not the truth. It's just that he shares the same views.

It'll still be sisus fault. And we'll still have morals of sewer rats for wanting our club to play in the stadium that was built for them and they propped up for years. It's unbelievable.

The truth? I've had to point out the higgs bought the club share out if financial difficulties within the club and not the stadium project. I've had to point out the loan was taken out by acl and not the council. So no problem handling the truth as long as it is just that.