Search results

Why didn't you go to Sixfields?

When you say sold??

Closest Ryanair nowadays from those places is to Stansted, Aer Lingus only from Cork to BHX, not SNN, still plenty of seats on that one. They may have brought a few more over if at Wycombe to be fair, make a weekend of it in London. Suppose they could always do Jumping Jaks.

Thought they were Dublin based? Will check those out then.

To be fair, "sales" is probably stretching it a bit.

The whole deal is very similar, except of course CCC and local taxpayers are now at risk of losing the money loaned to ACL if anything goes wrong, rather than a hedge-fund. I really thought that subsidising private loss making companies wasn't part of a local authorities remit, particularly one...

How are Wasps?

Somebody else who can't read. I wasn't the "legal expert" who said it, bigfatron was. However he's now disagreeing with his own "expert" legal opinion as it doesn't now fit the narrative. Sisu are cunts, should never have been involved with the club at all, but absolving any others of any...

Here perhaps?

It is exactly what they proposed to do, either all or 50%, whichever the council wanted. CCC then decided to do it themselves, thus taking all risk on the mortgage. Understandable a little when they had a stake in the company, not at all now.

Especially as I quoted him back to himself in my very first response to this thread. Not my fault he doesn't remember what he says, then argues with himself that he's a bit of a twat and doesn't understand himself.

That is the whole point, Anne Lucas(and many on here), said that ACL was very profitable without the club, when it was evident to anybody that it wasn't, or wouldn't be. This is all based on figures after the more "affordable" loan was in place and the season that Cov weren't playing at the Ricoh.

Seeing as none of us know the details of any of the "deals" it would be hard to be justified in having a concrete view on any of them.

So you were wrong before, but are right now, despite it being the same scenario, except that it was proven not to be state aid when protecting it's own asset, but wpuld be to a private company which it is now. You've spun yourself into a corner, changing your argument to suit your whims. First...

Is ACL not now a totally private company? Thank fuck for that, the whole Wasps thing just a horrible dream.

Quotes from you. http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/43006-A-Question-for-The-Accountants?highlight=acl+loan+illegal Post 37. See you in court?

It wasn't state aid when being made to a company protecting it's own investment. That is no longer the case, as you saaid yoursself, it would be state aid if maade to an entirely private company. That is what has happened now.

Do you mean that it does work like that when you use it to support the argument that it wasn't state aid, but doesn't when it doesn't?

Sisu were going to discharge the loan, so no public money would have been involved. Pretty much argues the case entirely for the offer Sisu put in.

You said it in relation to the CCC loan to ACL, ACL is now a totally seperate private body, who should repay the loan to the local taxpayers, either through their own funds(if they have them), or through their own borrowing(if they can get it). Local taxpayers should not have their funds put at...